Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:A convenient excuse to justify illegal killings (Score 1) 65

"Who's going to the slammer when the AI kills someone it shouldn't?"

The officer who ordered it deployed. Machines don't make independent decisions. They do what they're programmed to do. Humans decide what that is going to be, and send them off to do it. That's who goes to jail.

There's no difference between this and a self-driving car. Who goes to jail when a self driving car runs over a cyclist? The guy responsible for the car.

Who's getting wet over self-driving cars, Roscoe? Same technology, different job.

Comment Re:Strange (Score 2) 193

Because you need a DEEP hole to make it worthwhile, and all the pilot projects I've heard of have huge problems with corrosion.

Because water goes in clean, then dissolves every salt it comes in contact with (and it is HOT don't forget) so it comes out corrosive, loaded with sulfur, and toxic AF. So now you've got a f-ton of horrifying water trying to eat your pipes and pumps and storage tanks.

This does not happen with fracking nearly as much because they use water to fracture the rocks, and they -leave- it there as much as they can.

The whole point of geothermal is circulation. Circulation brings salts out of the ground. That's bad, generally speaking. Also expensive.

Comment Re:"The atmosphere is really big though" 2.0 (Score 1) 193

Maybe try calculating how much water you can inject into the Earth's crust before something you hadn't thought of happens.

Like a steam explosion, maybe? People never shut up about dangers of fracking, this is the turbo-nitrous version of fracking.

Such as, just ferinstance, what's the service life of a geothermal well liner, and what the hell do you do with one when the liner has corroded away?

Comment Re:Does this mean fracking is good now? (Score 1) 193

Yas, don't I remember hearing that injecting plain water into Mother Earth was Very Bad and we were all going to die from earthquakes and water pollution? I'm sure I read that right here at Slashdot. Like, continuously, since fracking became a thing in the news.

But doing -exactly- the same thing, only MORE, is good if it is geothermal. Right?

Somebody say "Aktchewally..." in 3, 2, 1...

Comment Re: Murderbot is awesome stuff (Score 2) 71

Yeah sure. Go read any of it and then get back to me with the "good writers" thing.

Being fair to Martha Wells, the Murderbot Series is good. However it is marred by the usual required themes that TOR seems to force on all it's writers these days. Her book that took Best Novel this year is one of the weakest in the series, due to lots of editing issues like guns that appear from nowhere, walk-on characters that vanish and are never heard from again, lots of stuff that shows a hurried write and a crappy edit.

Crappy editing is getting to be industry norm in the Big 5. You have to go to Indy to find good crafting.

Comment Re:How to determine the winners (Score 3, Interesting) 71

Yes, the voting is knee-jerk Leftist. Nobody reads the crap, as can be seen by the reviews most years. They couldn't, its unreadable Leftist crap.

This year Martha Wells wrote a decent-ish book, marred by the obligatory global warming, anti-capitalist, anti-racist, anti-human, themes that her publisher probably insisted she put in there. Not what I'd have given an award to, certainly.

The crowning glory this year is that after the internationally noted -screeching- about [gasp!] CONSERVATIVES "hijacking" the awards in 2016 (because they dared to buy tickets and vote for things they liked, the bastards!), yes this year the WorldCon was in fact physically hijacked and hauled off to China.

The 2023 WorldCon will be held in Communist China, in the city of Chengdu, which among other things contains a large slave facility.

The numbers say it all. More than 1100 votes for Chengdu placed by voters who interestingly don't even have a street address. Okay?

Comment Qanon is a psy-op? But Twitter isn't? (Score 1) 343

As I saw another poster say above, Qanon seems a load of crap to me. As does Pizzagate.

But. The more I see guys saying shit like: "I can reassure you that QAnon will disintegrate in the United States over time if effective measures are taken if and when Trump is defeated," the more I'm inclined to look harder at Qanon and Pizzagate to see if there's some fire under that smoke.

Because why? Because I see that the obviously fake Borat "Giuliani sex tape" remains up all over Twitter but the obviously real Hunter Biden sex tape is banned on Twitter. That's one psy-op I can -see- right in front of me.

How many are running that I can't see?

Comment Re:Get off my lawn. Oh hell yes. (Score 2) 160

I've been using Microsoft products since MS-DOS and the Compaq 386. If that makes me an old bastard, so be it.

In the Olden Days there was the Command Line. The Command Line sucked, because the average used can't/won't remember all that shit. I did, but that's because I was a computer weenie back in the day before it was cool. Normal people hired me because they couldn't figure it out.

In those days Microsoft was a pain in my ass because they KEPT CHANGING THINGS. DOS 2.1, the DIR command had certain options. DOS 2.103, they would change the frigging options. Sometimes they would remove entire commands and replace them with new ones.

Constantly. Constant churn, to no particular benefit.

And eventually the OS that used to fit on a 5.25" floppy ended up needing two 3.5" hard-shells. No one used 90% of that functionality. They just crammed it in there because the damn marketing department told them to.

Then came Windows and Mac. The one constant all these years was this asinine insistence on changing the operating system. There's no reason for most of it.

Example: Changing the shapes of icons is fine if your UI research reveals that "drop-shadows on icons improve ease-of-use by X%!" Okay, I'm up for an X% improvement in ease of use.

But they don't do that. They add drop shadows as an art project. The addition increases the compute load by whatever increment, increases visual clutter, and -decreases- the ease of use by adding a pointless change. Now the user has to acclimate to the new look.

Sometimes that is trivial, as with my drop-shadows example. Sometimes it is not, like when they went from XP to Vista. That was a disaster, as we all remember. They moved -everything-. They changed all the commands. They changed what everything looked like. The equivalent of switching a car from left-hand drive to right-hand drive for the next model year because it fit the styling better.

Change for the purpose of making things "New!" and "Fresh!" is ASININE and I hate them every time they do it.

Now that we have Windows 10 with its forced updates, forced Microsoft accounts, constant phoning-home etc. I've been thinking about quitting Microsoft in favor of something I can regain some personal control over. Whether it be Mac OS, Linux or something else, one of the main features I want is PREDICTABILITY. I want to be the one that decides when it updates. I want to decide if the UI changes or not. I want to say if it phones home or not.

I want to be able to run my office so that everything doesn't break every single fucking time a new update gets pushed. I want the office ladies to be able to PRINT every morning instead of spending an hour chasing down what setting the fucking update broke that made all the printers invisible.

If I never hear "where's my printer?!!!" ever again, it will be too soon.

Dear Microsoft, pay attention.

Comment I see Slashdot votes DemocRat. (Score -1, Troll) 382

Dear hipster dicks,

1) Questioning "consensus" is what scientists do. They make up a theory about something and they DISPROVE it. Glowball Warmening is a -theory-.

2) By the way, Trump is still the president of the USA, and Epstein didn't kill himself. Just thought you could use a reminder.

Slashdot Top Deals

Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward.

Working...