Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Pee the numbers into a snowbank (Score 1) 91

So we can't trust the data because Trump fired someone who consistently produced bad data?

As a security professional I still want that data on a blockchain because it makes changing the story retroactively without making a mistake more difficult. That the POTUS has no shortage of security experts advises him means he knows that is and is choosing transparency and accountability anyway... hardly a move suggestive of someone cooking the data.

How is a blockchain with only one party, the federal government, that can write to it secure? If they want to rewrite an older block and make the later blocks consistent, they can do that. People who are watching for changes will notice, the same as for data published to a website, etc.

Transparency and accountability? I'll believe in that more when masked anonymous "federal agents" are not roaming the streets with impunity.

Comment Re:Who cares? (Score 1) 91

Yes, Trump's administration has said that they will not enforce the laws regarding bribery in foreign countries. Even with that, no reasonable company is going to show that "above the table". Other countries and the country with the people being bribed still have laws with penalties. Plus whomever is President in the future might retroactively change that policy.

Comment Re:So its treason, then. (Score 1) 173

It may be grounds for impeachment, but it isn't treason. The US Constitution defines treason as

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."

Slashdot Top Deals

"I have not the slightest confidence in 'spiritual manifestations.'" -- Robert G. Ingersoll

Working...