You miss the point that they are largely deforesting to supply demand in other parts of the world -- whether its for "cheap" agriculture, wood, etc.
No, U. I asked "what comfort you could conceivably give up that would give Brazilian farmers an alternative to deforestation?" If you believe our luxurious choices of shopping at Wal-Mart instead of shopping at Mom n' Pawp (who wholesale with the same traders as Wal-Mart) will alter the old supply and demand curve until Brazillian Farmers can make money from practices aside from getting free cropland by mowing down the unclaimed forests, then I would like to hear your illustration to that point.
Oh, stop getting your panties in a twist, Slashdot, and RTFS: Here are the curriculum documents, with the TEKS and SBOE changes-color coded.
The wild-eyed claims being made about these very mild, mostly correct changes are absurd. Jefferson is not being cut or even importantly sidelined, the Founding Fathers are not being portrayed as Christian Righties, and anyone who's mentioned Orwell in this thread should be beaten to death with a bat made of cliches. So everybody calm the frak down and get informed.
Completely agreed. I don't know which is worse - the fact that people can't accept that the risk from terrorism is minimal, or the fact that an awful lot of this is simply security theatre which probably won't be exposed as such because the threat is minimal.
I've mentioned it a few times before, but one of the major reasons I refuse to believe the sincerity of measures like this scanning technology is that one can purchase large glass bottles in any airport departure lounge. A glass bottle is a far more effective weapon than many of the other items that they'll confiscate from hand luggage, yet I've never even seen the issue mentioned.
With apologies to the late great comedian:
Personally I think we shouldn't let anyone with really big hands on an airplane.
While at the same time, Linux systems are not on this treadmill - largely due to software design.
With Windows systems, the hardware you get is usually just 'adequate' for the software, even if you get a higher end system. This is less the case with W7, but it's been the case with every release so far. Furthermore, upgrades down the line are either not possible (OS X and the limited lifecycle) or tend to hit performance pretty hard (Windows service packs).
The average life cycle of my Linux systems has, so far, been about 5 years, with new memory and/or replacement disks being purchased either when they were cheap (RAM) or due to failure (hard disk). An Athlon 550 I bought in early 1999 ('98?) functioned well until I relegated that system to 'file server' and got an IBM Thinkpad X30 in 2004. That laptop lasted until last April (until the third disk failed and I decided it was time to replace it - 512M was actually getting a little tight due to Firefox and the desire to virtualize).
Throughout this time, I've not "skimped" and kept old software, and I've not gotten agitated by lack of performance (the x30 came close with the RAM limitation, though). No, the systems haven't been suitable for gaming, but then neither are most new systems, either. I suspect this Phenom II will last a good number of years for me: certainly 3 years.
(Granted, I've also been somewhat fortunate to get new systems right after the latest-greatest is cheap enough to consider buying - eg. DDR3 - allowing me to upgrade my RAM several years into use for 'pennies').
The next time you're low on cash and need to get a quick read on the public's feeling on politics or current events, consider sampling Twitter. According to a new report out of Carnegie Mellon University's computer science department, sentiments expressed via the millions of daily tweets strongly correlate with well-established public opinion polls, such as the Index of Consumer Sentiment (ICS) and Gallup polls. The data analysis methodology still needs some tweaking, but the researchers still believe that Twitter posts could act as a "cheap, rapid means of gauging public opinion."
Assistant professor Noah Smith and his team collected 1 billion Twitter messages posted in 2008 and 2009 and analyzed them for topic (politics versus economy) and sentiment (positive or negative). They compared the consumer confidence tweets against ICS data from the same period as well as Gallup's Economic Confidence Index. Tweets about President Obama were compared against Gallup's daily tracking polls from that time period, and tweets about the election were compared against 46 polls created by Pollster.
Read the comments on this post
According to all the latest reports, there was no truth in any of the earlier reports.