So you apparently think that the only type of thought is scientific thought, and the only type of statement is a scientific statement? The deductive principle of logic is unfalsifiable. Is it a non-statement? Is its validity irrelevant? It is hard to imagine you think it is, as you can't do math or science without it.
By "non-statement", I meant the claim is irrelevant to reality. For example, I could claim that your green is really my red. We both describe light of 510m wavelength as "green", but we might perceive them differently. This claim is irrelevant. It is a "non-statement".
It is the equivalent of claiming that the claims of the Christian God are wrong because Jesus claimed in Matthew 5:13 that his followers were made of salt, but they are demonstrably not.
If "salt" isn't literally "salt", then perhaps the the Flat Earth Theory is also correct. Perhaps "flat" isn't literally "flat". Perhaps "flat" means "roughly spherical".
Perhaps 6 days was really 4.5 billion years. Adam and Eve were actually single-cell lifeforms. Abraham and sons were really dinosaurs. Egypt was really Pangaea.
If you are allowed to reinterpret the Bible to fit modern scientific observations, then it's a meaningless book. You can do the same thing with any book, any movie, any song, anything... and it'll describe the nature of the Universe "perfectly".
