Comment This is "science"? (Score 1) 1435
Why do you habitually make conclusions after running what is clearly a statistically insignificant number of experimental trials?
I recall an episode where you compared the fuel efficiency of a car with it's windows open to one with closed windows but the a/c on. After a single experiment, you declared that the closed-window car was more efficient, despite the fact that the difference in efficiency was small, and you ran only a single experiment.
There are obviously a dozen or more variables that could change the outcome of the experiment. The make and model of car, the speed, the weather conditions at the time, type of gasoline could all have an effect. Yet somehow you drew a conclusion from this one experiment.
I recall an episode where you compared the fuel efficiency of a car with it's windows open to one with closed windows but the a/c on. After a single experiment, you declared that the closed-window car was more efficient, despite the fact that the difference in efficiency was small, and you ran only a single experiment.
There are obviously a dozen or more variables that could change the outcome of the experiment. The make and model of car, the speed, the weather conditions at the time, type of gasoline could all have an effect. Yet somehow you drew a conclusion from this one experiment.
