That goes against their whole Netflix and chill binge watching campaign. Plus they want to keep people on the platform as much as possible as that gives them leverage during content negotiations and so on.

A better and simpler solution is to look at viewing habits.

If you watch episodes 1,2,3 from one location, then 4,5,6 from another, and 7,8,9 from a third- you are probably just traveling.

If you are consistently watching the same episodes from multiple locations, that's suspicious.

Or if you only watch show A from location A, but show B from location B, that's also suspicious.

Though I would be surprised if Netflix wasn't already doing that since that's just common sense.

> How would you handle the same situation if you were running Netflix?

You look at viewing habits.

If they are watching the episodes in a series once and sequentially- it's pretty obvious that's not a shared account just someone traveling.

If they are consistently watching the same shows from different locations, or only watching show A from location A and show B from location B it's pretty likely they are sharing.

Ok, I do understand. Fucking Wall Street assholes running the show and obsessed with squeezing every last ounce of profit regardless of what it does to their brand.

But the thing is- John Deere makes a pretty good product and people would continue to buy them thus ensuring a steady and long term customer base. Or at least it should- but instead they seem utterly intent on alienating all of their customers and that just seems like such a stupid long term play.

Blue Origin's New Glenn made it to orbit on January 16, 2025 so they've already made it to space. Obviously that wasn't a manned mission- but the rocket itself performed pretty well for a first flight and successfully delivered its payload.

I feel like all we hear about are shortages and backlogs for high end graphics and dedicated AI chips- so where is all this extra export capacity going to come from?

Basic economics- if the profit you generate from price hikes outweighs the money you lose from customers canceling- you keep raising prices.

And on this news Netflix will continue to raise prices- which is why I canceled my service when they announced their most recent hike. Not enough good content, they kept canceling the few good things they did have, and I simply wasn't getting value out of it.

Not to mention that the arr's have made it easy to live without Netflix in the first place.

What a stupid comment.

The return on investment for NASA is about 3 to 1 in direct economic returns and is estimated to be as high as 40 to 1 in indirect benefits- in other words for every dollar we spend, we get back $40.

That's not a waste of money, it's actually a phenomenal investment.

https://nss.org/settlement/nasa/spaceresvol4/newspace3.html

"Estimates of the return on investment in the space program range from $7 for every $1 spent on the Apollo Program to $40 for every $1 spent on space development today."

Also- he has a bridge for sale...

Seriously, what would a literal Russian asset do that's different from what Trump is doing?

It doesn't matter whether he's on their payroll, just an enthusiastic supporter, or a convenient idiot, tell me what he would be doing differently? Cozying up to Russia and parroting their propaganda, talking about removing sanctions, blaming Ukraine for a war Russia started, standing down our offensive AND defensive cybersecurity programs- it's like a bad joke. And for some reason half the country is still cheering him on- it boggles the mind.

> A 200kWh battery

What car is shipping with a 200kWh battery aside from the Hummer EV?

> BYD has been making batteries much larger than that for years, it's just a question of if they can fit one to a car. My guess would be that they probably can these days.

Sure, a Hummer.

> at 1MW would only be 5C, well within the safe zone for modern chemistries.

Even the Ioniq 5 maxes out at 2.9C and averages closer to 2.3C.

You're talking double that and with a massive battery. With a much more realistic 100kWh battery you're talking 10C and that's nuts.

> Not only is it doable, it's been proven years ago to the point where charging systems designed for 4.5MW are expected to be finalised with the update to IEC 61851-23 this year. It's a 1.5kV charging system by the way with actively cooled cables.

I'm well aware of what the charging standards allow and water cooling is already used in some charging cables- that's nothing new.

> That kind of fear has been present since day one of EVs, and it has been proven unfounded. Engineers know what they are doing and know the problems batteries face and design around these problems.

Oh, so every other EV manufacturer is limiting their charge rates for no reason? Or is it only BYD that has figured out how to charge them without causing damage?

> And that tech has an excellent track record of reliability.

I have to say I am absolutely loving the BYD shills that come out in force every time they are mentioned.

BYD has only been making cars for 19 years and EVs for 15 and their early models most certainly were not reliable so I have no clue what this claim is based on.

But hey- there's no reason to argue about this- we'll see if this actually materializes.

> Stroking your chin and saying “aha, but what about degradation” as though keeping degradation to acceptable levels won’t have been one of the key engineering objectives for BYD, to which they’’ll have devoted really substantial effort, is just absurd.

Ahh yes- they've made a battery breakthrough and kept it a complete secret instead of yelling it from the rooftops to prove how awesome Chinese tech is... Would you like to buy a bridge?

Yes, because China never plays fast and loose with safety standards.

Seriously- we're talking about fundamental limits of physics- you need proper insulation and sufficient cable diameter to carry current without overheating.

You can only push so much current into a battery without destroying it and the higher the current, the faster they degrade.

Not to mention modern fast chargers are 1000v and at the limit of how much current you can push through their wires and connectors. To hit 1 megawatt you either need even higher voltages, or higher current- both of which require stouter cables and connectors. Not to mention the added safety risks that come with such systems.

Is it doable? Sure. Do I think current battery designs can handle those rates without rapid degradation? No.

> You think the Chinese military is making late USSR quality technology?

Judging by their military aircraft engines- yes.