Comment Re:Torrent (Score 3, Informative) 39
You're thinking of anna's archive, they even have a torrents in need of seeders generator where you put how many TB you can seed and it gives you as many torrents as will fit in the given space.
You're thinking of anna's archive, they even have a torrents in need of seeders generator where you put how many TB you can seed and it gives you as many torrents as will fit in the given space.
That's exactly what this bill would do!
Well within reason. They can choose between permanent DST or no DST.
They're being dishonest assholes by omitting to mention that the new law would still allow them to just opt out of it and lock into normal time year round.
Then opt out you dishonest fuck.
That's the whole god damned point of this.
The law currently says that states can opt out of DST but they can't have permanent DST.
With it permanent states can still opt out so this gives the choice back to the states.
You know STATES RIGHTS? That thing you lying fucks keep claiming to support but never actually do.
There hasn't been a playable mobile version of the sims since the flip phone versions.
Everything for android/ios has been this "free" but you have to pay to breathe bullshit.
With the official version shutting down does that mean a modded actually playable version without having to spend 4,000 years waiting or $50,000 on paid skips will become available?
It's gradually getting less useful as it's becoming more and more overrun with bots.
I'd trust it more for imperfect translation than a learning aid.
You generally have to verify anything AI says at this point and if you don't know the language you're going to have a really hard time noticing when it's hallucinating things for your lesson plan.
That said duolingo is going the same stupid route of having AI write it's lesson plans.
that could instill incorrect copyright awareness in most users, including teenagers.
What's incorrect? Copyright isn't there to benefit YOU.
If it was it would expire in a timeframe that humans could actually use.
If it was like patents where it's 20 years you could reasonably have some argument about it.
As is it's completely absurd.
Even then unless something has changed last I checked the majority of hydrogen sold is actually produced from natural gas rather than electrolysis so it may not be as clean as expected.
AFAIK there are no consumer vehicles storing it in a liquid state
Imho the ideal way to do it would be to produce it on site from water and electricity thus avoiding the shipping issues.
Still I think that at least for consumer vehicles it's missed its chance.
EVs already beat it in most every category, only things that need a much higher power to weight ratio like semis and trains might still be viable.
Now I don't think 1Gbps needs to be the base plan but it should absolutely be available to everyone at a reasonable price.
The main point being anything that can handle 256/256Mbps will cost roughly as much as just rolling out fiber in the first place.
Does it cut carbon by 35% or does the AI say it cuts carbon by 35%? Assuming it does, does the new formula substituting in Elmer's glue actually hold up?
I've noticed a lot of people even really really high level people are trusting what it says waaaaaay too much.
They didn't even change the network name.
STINKY is or at least was at one point the default wifi network name for starlink APs to push people into changing it from the default.
Yeah we moved from AT&T to the city munifiber which had a outdoor ONT to 100Mbps ethernet, they're still using the same equipment, it's 20+ years old now, no config or anything just straight public IP 10/10Mbps, aside from losing a couple Ethernet ports over the time we used it, it was rock solid equipment.
We since moved to Optimum cable 200/20Mbps, they let us use our own modem (their rental is so locked down as to be unfit for purpose in business use) it hasn't been nearly as reliable and optimum makes you call in and beg every year to keep a decent rate but it's a lot faster for the price.
$90/mo for 20/20Mbps munifiber vs $76/mo for 200/20Mbps cable.
City is supposed to finish upgrades to replace all the 20+ year old equipment by the end of this year so we will most likely be switching back once the new rates are available around the same time optimum is going to be jacking our rates up again.
Optimum has gone up every single year we've had it.
The city has had the same pricing for over a decade, which as shown above isn't necessarily a good thing but it's easy to budget for and doesn't make itself a hassle.
Still to get even 100/100Mbps via the munifiber is currently $275/mo so that $199/mo difference is worth the hassle and outages for the extra speed.
I still remember that one time AT&T bricked everyone's spare modems by making the modems use a weird proprietary authentication scheme so if they weren't online to get the new certificates before the old ones expired they couldn't connect to get the new ones.
Sure they could have just issued update files so people could just manually load the new version but this is att.
Eventually someone managed to pull the update file from one of the working modems and posted it online so it was possible to unbrick them but really.
That was the Motorola 2210.
I also remember the newer model after that the Motorola NVG510 you had to root to change the redirect settings or anytime it lost connection it would hijack everyone's browsers instead of gracefully erroring out.
Even then it wasn't the hijacking that was the problem as much as it was that they didn't set it as nocache so you had to go around and reset things after the connection came back up because it would just keep redirecting to the modem.
Have I mentioned lately how happy I am I don't have to deal with that company for anything anymore?
And that's been the preferred tool since what XP?
It's baffling that they've never been able to match the performance.
Leaded avgas is still fine though right?
We're only banning fictional problems not actual ones right?
Writing software is more fun than working.