Faster speeds being available benefit me even if I don't need them.

I'd like a cheaper 1/1Gbps connection.

That only happens if something 2.5Gbps or better is available so 1Gbps stops being the ultra high end plan.

There are places where they're selling 1/1Gbps for $30/mo now because they're trying to convince grandma she needs 5/5Gbps for youtube for when her grandkids come over.

If someone lives five miles from the nearest connection, currently on 100A AC and POTS, is the limited budget better spent on running five miles of fiber or dropping off a satellite terminal?

Absofuckinglutetly fiber. If it was worthwhile to run power, gas, water or a shitty copper phone line then it's absolutely without question worthwhile to run fiber.

Our local electric coop recently made the decision to bring fiber to 100% of their customers, if you can get electric from them you can get 1/1Gbps fiber internet. None of that "it's too far" bullshit. They went from 0% to 100% in THREE YEARS.

There's no reason to deploy any tech today that can't do at least 1/1Gbps as any tech that can't would already be long obsolete before it was installed so when future needs come along you're just going to have to rip it all out and replace it with something half way modern like you should've done in the first place and it's going to cost far more than it would've to just install something decent in the first place.

~1/3 voted for ~1/3 against and ~1/3rd couldn't be bothered to give a damn.

Roughly half the country was either in active support of this bullshit or was ok enough with it happening to not vote.

If they could be bothered to make one with as much power as a 5 year old flagship i'd probably already own one.

We'd still be way way better off if we could just get devices that let us run our own stuff in the first place.

Doing it this way forces people to choose between having usable or secure devices.

Even if they left a 479 page manifesto and a step by step log of everything they did you probably wouldn't be able to access whatever folder it was in without jailbreaking the device.

They are usually a lot better IME but only in cases where what i'm looking for actually exists in the f-droid store at all which is often not the case.

Often times even if there is an alternative on f-droid it's like "incompatible because last updated 12 years ago"

Still on the play store I end up uninstalling most apps on first open because the very first thing they do when you open the app is display a full screen ad.

Unfortunately and ironically for a learning company they seem to be completely incapable of learning.

Just the "plating" bit gave be flashbacks to simcity 3000 with the complaints of them supposedly having gold fixtures if you dared give them a plumbing maintenance budget.

Phones already have pretty poor battery life overall and you want them to run the GPS all the time??

You're thinking of anna's archive, they even have a torrents in need of seeders generator where you put how many TB you can seed and it gives you as many torrents as will fit in the given space.

That's exactly what this bill would do!

Well within reason. They can choose between permanent DST or no DST.

They're being dishonest assholes by omitting to mention that the new law would still allow them to just opt out of it and lock into normal time year round.

Then opt out you dishonest fuck.
That's the whole god damned point of this.

The law currently says that states can opt out of DST but they can't have permanent DST.

With it permanent states can still opt out so this gives the choice back to the states.

You know STATES RIGHTS? That thing you lying fucks keep claiming to support but never actually do.