Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Censorship

Submission + - How to silence free speech silently (washingtonpost.com) 1

quizzicus writes: "The Washington Post writes today about a sensitive White House document detailing how to screen for, silence, and remove protesters who show up at the President's public appearances. Obtained by an ACLU subpoena in the Rank v. Jenkins case, the Presidential Advance Manual (pdf) lays out strategies such as searching audience members at the door for hidden protest material, strategically placing "rally squads" throughout the crowd to intercept and shout down hecklers, and forcefully removing dissenters who cannot be squelched. The manual advises, however, that staff should "decide if the solution would cause more negative publicity than if the demonstrators were simply left alone.""

Comment Re:Pay for the Progress Bar You Use! (Score 1) 237

I should point out one difference between the US & Europe. The USPTO is quite pro-software patent, as is the EPO (European Patent Office). However, although the EPO has issued many software patents, they are legally questionable, because the European Patent Convention says that software cannot be patented. So, even though these patents have been issued, it is unclear as to whether they will be held valid by the courts. Some courts have said no, a few have said yes, but on the whole it is still legally undecided. By contrast, in the US the courts have already said yes to software patents. Thus, the US really is in a whole lot worse situation than Europe. (At the end of the day, patent offices can issue patents to their heart's content -- the real issue is whether the courts are willing to enforce them.)

Slashdot Top Deals

"Take that, you hostile sons-of-bitches!" -- James Coburn, in the finale of _The_President's_Analyst_

Working...