Comment Not the government's role (Score 1) 86
I like art. I like artists. I buy things from the artists that make things I like. Commercial viability? I tend to enjoy the things that are less commercial. So yes, the ones I like in particular would probably benefit from this. But I have to ask what makes it the government's responsibility to use tax dollars to support things that aren't commercially viable and don't return any value on investment? Most of the artists operating in that realm are not doing so to make a living. They love what they do. Most of them work a normal job. I feel like this is how it should work. And much like welfare the amount we're talking about isn't even enough to survive. Just another way of creating government dependance at the expense of the taxpayer.