audio of him saying "Alright, alright, alright"
Sincere question -- who "owns" lines from movies? The writer(s), the film studio, the actor, or
If it is indeed the actor, how does that sidestep the analogous "work for hire" copyright interpretation in software development ?
...From 2003 to 2017, Mr. Trump's companies were approved for more than 1,000 H-2 visas for jobs like cooks, housekeepers and waiters at his properties, including Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Fla., and the Trump National Golf Club in Jupiter, Fla., Labor Department data show. In each instance, the companies had to attest that there were no American citizens who could perform those jobs
...
What that (and almost all other discussions on H* visas) is missing is the implicit "... [there were no American citizens who could perform those jobs] at the (low?) wages we want to pay for those jobs" -- offer $1,500/day for those jobs and "poof", no labor shortage!
"The EV unit, which Ford calls Model e, sold 10,000 vehicles in the quarter, down 20% from the number it sold a year earlier. And its revenue plunged 84% to about $100 million, which Ford attributed mostly to price cuts for EVs across the industry."
...This is not accounting tricks...
So you believe they literally sold 10,000 units for a total of $100 million, i.e. at a price of $10k each ?
...discovered that her own driving data had been shared with data brokers working with the insurance industry, despite not being enrolled in the program. GM has since discontinued the Smart Driver product and stopped sharing data with LexisNexis and Verisk
Can we safely replace "sharing" with "selling" ?
If anything they might make me think a bit about the message, v. just tuning out on something like "Maintain a safe following distance":
I note that it is possible for a stream of packets to contain more than one subsequence of ``wheat'' packets, in addition to the chaff packets. Each wheat subsequence would be recognized separately using a different authentication key. One interesting consequence of this is that if law enforcement were to demand to see an authentication key so it could identify the wheat, the sender could yield up one such key that identifies a wheat subsequence containing an innocuous message as the wheat, and leaving everything else as ``chaff''. The real message would still be buried in the chaff. This is reminiscent of the technique of ``deniable encryption'' proposed by Canetti et al. (1997).
Does anybody know the legal reasoning that compels defendants to provide blood or DNA, but doesn't compel them to type a password into a device?
The "compelled to reveal password" situation does have the twist where you can claim "I don't know the password" -- I vaguely remember some cases over the years where people have been held in contempt (or the equivalent) until the revealed their password. What if they truly do not know it? Life in prison?
In any case, I found the comparison to "standing in a lineup" to be the poorest of the analogies.
Alternative headline: father explains parenting strategy for raising irresponsible children.
"The key is to blame others," he said.
Another alternative:"father begins laying the foundation for wrongful death suit defense" (for when Mr. McCarthy's estate sues).
The obvious way to prevent terrorism within airports is to have the TSA set up a check point outside the airport and create the large queue there.
You might as well just redefine "within airports" to mean "the area within the TSA checkpoint radius" -- that way the whole Security Theater apparatus continues on, and you don't even have to set up any new checkpoints.
http://music.cbc.ca/#!/radio3
What makes it worse to me is that since they know how many flights are scheduled, they pretty much know exactly how many people will be passing through particular security gates (and at about what time, for that matter). Knowing that you think they could staff the checkpoints appropriately -- even without access to actual ticketing information, historical load factors should allow for very good guesses.
Maybe change it so the H-1B visas are awarded based on annual salary?
In other words, issue the visas for the jobs that will pay the most. My guess is a transparent market like that would quickly get rid of wage disparities (though how to combat the lobbying effort+money that supports the status quo is the next obvious question).
Under federal rules, employers like TCS, Infosys and Wipro that have large numbers of H-1B workers in the United States are required to declare that they will not displace American workers. But the companies are exempt from that requirement if the H-1B workers are paid at least $60,000 a year. H-1B workers at outsourcing firms often receive wages at or slightly above $60,000, below what skilled American technology professionals tend to earn, so those firms can offer services to American companies at a lower cost, undercutting American workers.
It's time to boot, do your boot ROMs know where your disk controllers are?
