Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: Kaspersky (Score 5, Insightful) 33

Speaking from the POV of a Russian said cybercriminals are most likely protected or supported by criminals who in turn are most likely protected or supported by the government. Which means that said researchers are afraid of repercussions for whistleblowing because they are unlikely to receive any protection from the government if they were to be targrted. Since Russia is an oligarchy state any government agencies (courts of law/police) will favour the highest bidder or whom ever has better connections to the upper echelon. I imagine that Kasparsky engineers are unlikely to have the funds to outbid criminals or have the necessary connections. Not to mention that in the Russian culture whistleblowing is extremely frowned upon.

Comment Re: TL;DR (Score 2) 367

Final triumph? The one percenters have been "winning" since life first crawled out of the primordial soup. Or do you propose to stop evolution in its track? If you're so concerned with the welfare of your fellow human beings go take the next bum you see home, feed him and let him spend the night, or are you too concerned he's gonna touch your shiny Apple gadgets with his grimy hands?
Idle

Submission + - Remotely pat your pet with Kinect and a Wiimote (extremetech.com)

MrSeb writes: "Taylor Valtrop, an enterprising roboticist with a penchant for pussies, has crafted the mother of all Kinect (and Wiimote!) hacks: The teleoperation of a robot to groom a cat. Using a Nao, a $15,000 robot; a treadmill (for moving the robot forward); a head-mounted display (to see what the robot sees); Kinect (for tracking his movements); and two Wiimotes (to move the robot's hands), Valtrop is able to pat a cat with surprising accuracy and gentleness (except for where he accidentally hits the cat in the face)."

Slashdot Top Deals

Real Programmers think better when playing Adventure or Rogue.

Working...