In stem course when all the answers are black and white, this makes no sense. But the overwhelming majority of university is now very weak fluff social sciences. At that point you can really only rank them against each other. There is no absolute correct answer to anything

The analogy falls flat because in those cases they actually had individual transistors and tubes. In this case, like everything quantum, they donâ(TM)t have individual ions, instead itâ(TM)s a huge cloud of them that they then do math on to claim that most of the group of ions all had some entanglement.

I think it was clear youtube wouldnâ(TM)t be included, but then âoeshortsâ became a thing and basically made some of it a copy of tiktok.

Obama got a book deal for tens of millions and then gave the administration ended up giving the same book company all the grants for billions to provide books for schools. Yet no one said anythingâ¦. Itâ(TM)s been corrupted for a very long time

Disney has drm such that even as a posting customer you only get 720p, even on windows. It is only apple and google platforms that get 1080p/4k

Sony offer fairly cheap rates for left over time on pick and place etc, which is why piâ(TM)s are always all over the place with availability.

Itâ(TM)s intentional Itâ(TM)sa front used to funnel money Running a cve database doors not cost $11b a year. $11b is what an organisation with 50,000 employees spends.

You can create quantum rng by shining a lazer on an angled peice of glass. The photon has a chance to go reflect and chance to refract. You can even buy these as PCIE cards that can produce hundreds of megabits per second for a few hundred $$$. This is what poker gaming sites etc use.

That problem still exists today. For example: bitwarden is popular, but the 2fa is used only between you and the server , not as part of the encryption of your data.

There is none and they deluding themselves. Jacob Barandes has basically successfully mathematically replaced traditional wave function quantum mechanics with indivisible stochastic processes. Traditional physicals thinks a measurement is absolute and this is why they think there is entanglement and collapse of wave function. As shown by Brandes - the actual issue is just they are measuring one individual stochastic processes *another* and this results in a appearance of entanglement etc when there is none.

Thatâ(TM)s not the problem, all content is always in TLS regardless of vpn. The problem is when you use a vpn, you are very obvious to government/isp, as you are only talking to one end point and not making multiple tcp connections and dns lookups like a normal user would. So the idea is to use many ips as the end point with many tcp connects and disconnects and have lots of secure dns look ups. so anyone listening sees a bunch of random stuff that looks like normal encrypted user behaviour

It allows them to track you. Example: site a could generate a 64bit random id to you. Then the site hosts 64 images - 1 for each bit in an ID. The site has you load only the images for bits in your your ID that are 1, and not the images for bits in your ID that are zero. Then when you go to site b, site b has you load all 64 images, and times how long it takes to load each one. Those will allow them to calculate your ID. Now they know you are the same user from site A. Site B will also repeat what site A did to you, and post that into to site C D E etc etc, so they can all track you, link your account together etc etc.

It can be downloaded then throw away. There is no need for the browser to keep two copies.

That might be the design, but itâ(TM)s not the implementation. None of the major vendors let you export your passkeys for backup or transfer. Itâ(TM)s the whole reason why passkeys are going no where. They are using pass keys to lock users in. Because of that - passkeys is useless to those offering websites and services. If the user loses access to the passkeys they still expect to be to fall back to email/password with a sms/topt code. So you have to still implement all that.

Thatâ(TM)s basically the intent of the rules. These rules are not new. Even back in 2015 there were only a few mobile phones you could get in indonesia. The real story here is apple seem to have been throwing money around at things - but not the actual parts/assembly to make out that they are effectively following the rule economically. They figured they could just buy a new amendment.