Comment Fuck Beta, Fork Alpha.Time to resurrect slashcode? (Score 2, Interesting) 116
Comment Fuck Beta, Fork Alpha.Time to resurrect slashcode? (Score 1) 204
Comment Fuck Beta, Fork Alpha.Time to resurrect slashcode? (Score 2) 93
Comment Fuck Beta, Fork Alpha.Time to resurrect slashcode? (Score 3, Interesting) 268
Comment Fuck Beta, Fork Alpha.Time to resurrect slashcode? (Score 1) 180
Comment Fuck Beta, Fork Alpha.Time to resurrect slashcode? (Score 1) 271
Comment Fuck Beta, Fork Alpha.Time to resurrect slashcode? (Score 2, Informative) 250
Comment Re:We all know what's going to happen... (Score 1) 222
I believe you mean Minilla:
Having watched Godzilla vs. SpaceGodzilla last night, I feel obligated to remind you that it may also be Little Godzilla: http://godzilla.wikia.com/wiki/Godzilla_Junior
Comment Re:Copyright Infringement? (Score 1) 335
Hm,
After all, they duplicated the site/logo/etc without the permission of the actual copyright owners.
They could also make a case for monetary damages and damages to their reputation (trademark?), especially when you consider lost advertisement revenue (if we do believe that the advertisement business model for the Web makes any sense).
Comment Re:Problems in the license, and an alternative? (Score 2) 233
Linux has LUKS and dm-crypt (Android uses a modified version of dm-crypt to protect the
re: TrueCrypt container format, dm-crypt and cryptsetup/LUKS: http://grugq.tumblr.com/post/60464139008/alternative-truecrypt-implementations
Comment Re:Problems in the license, and an alternative? (Score 2) 233
Given all of this, plus the problems with TrueCrypt authorship etc. I think the best course of action is replacing with a free implementation, maybe starting with something like this?
Ah, I see the current TrueCrypt license has undergone substantial changes since the early days. Looks like a complete mess to me
Comment Problems in the license, and an alternative? (Score 5, Insightful) 233
...if you distribute modified versions of TrueCrypt,
you cannot charge for copies. That is non-free...
TrueCrypt seems to be reserving the right to sue any licensee for copyright infringement, no matter whether they comply with the conditions of the license or not. Based on this, our counsel advised that above and beyond being non-free, software under this license is not safe to use...
Our counsel advised us that this license has the appearance of being full of clever traps, which make the license appear to be a sham (and non-free).
Given all of this, plus the problems with TrueCrypt authorship etc. I think the best course of action is replacing with a free implementation, maybe starting with something like this?