Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Too late. Already being done (Score 1) 412

No one with a net worth of less than $100M allowed on the property.

You also see this same divide at more normal levels of income; the people in coastal cities who are wealthy and success versus those who live elsewhere. These two groups increasingly only communicate within their groups and share views on politics, environment, health, etc. This trend seems likely to continue (particularly with automation) and be the great story of our time.

Comment Re:I have a great idea... (Score 1) 412

Round up the 5 or 10 % wealthiest people on the planet and their families.

Always a good start.

People will deliberately aim to avoid being in that top range by cutting their production; those who are selected will be those unfortunate enough to be producing too much.

Do you honestly think this will make things better, or do you just want to indulge in a bit of jealous violence/genocide?

Comment Re:I'm not wealthy, but I am happy. Not j (Score 1) 412

Economic success is predicated first and foremost on who your parents are. It determines much of your opportunity in all areas; education, connections, geographical location.

It seems like you've associated a lot of stuff with 'who your parents are', but I basically agree.

My question is what your ideal solution would be? In any real world scenario some individuals will do better and others will do worse based on the arbitrary conditions that affect them (i.e. genetics + environment). They have no 'control' since they themselves are fully determined by these conditions. Which people do you want to succeed? And who should fail?

Comment Re:I'm not wealthy, but I am happy. Not j (Score 1) 412

You denigrate and dismiss the work and effort made individuals and reduce them to a group.

Indeed.

I think the purpose of this kind of argument is to add others, who didn't contribute, into the 'group' and therefore deserving of part of the output of the 'group'. The truth, however, is that the people who contribute are already compensated by nature of the trades they perform. Those who don't, are not.

Now it's true that government contributes to people's wealth by enforcing the law, building roads, etc., however the most wealthy tend to pay disproportionately into these systems and hence government workers are compensated for this contribution.

Comment Re:Nuclear economics (Score 1) 342

For those seeking some figures: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_electricity_by_source

Interesting to note that wind power seems more competitive than I had thought - all the estimates seem to show onshore wind is cheaper than, or as cheap as, nuclear power. However, solar appears to be considerably more expensive than wind or nuclear.

Comment Re:Interesting Favorites Chosen (Score 1) 610

Well almost everyone is getting richer (adjusted for inflation), with the richest making the greatest gains. More importantly though, more and more people all over the world are moving out of poverty. Add to that the increasing social freedoms around the world. Many problems, including excessive inequality in wealth (or power/influence), are solvable. It's overly pessimistic to simply resign ourselves to a "bleak, dystopian police state" considering things are (in general) better than they've ever been. Personally, I think our main concern should be climate change.

Comment Re:Interesting Favorites Chosen (Score 1) 610

It looks like the smart guys at NASA agree with many of us 'dotters that the future is going to be a bleak, dystopian police state where the richer get richer and the poor eat noodles off the street.

Really? Despite all the long-term shifts up to this point that have been in the opposite direction? It seems you've succumbed to pessimism rather too easily.

Comment Re:Remove the artificial monopoly (Score 1, Flamebait) 299

'Flamebait' != 'Disagree'. The parent makes a valid point. There's no reason for people living in towns/cities to subsidise those who choose to live in rural areas, by monopoly, taxes or otherwise. Also, encouraging people to live in larger settlements is both an economically and environmentally sound suggestion.
Earth

GPS Receiver Noise Can Be Used To Detect Snow Depth 51

cremeglace writes "Scientists at the University of Colorado at Boulder have found a use for GPS besides finding restaurants or the occasional road-that-doesn't-exist: it can be used to measure snow depth. The new technique, which takes advantage of distortions of the GPS signal after it reflects off the snowpack, may potentially improve weather forecasts by allowing meteorologists to track snowfall patterns. ScienceNOW has the story, which one geophysicist describes as 'a classical case of one person's noise becoming another person's signal.'"

Slashdot Top Deals

"An ounce of prevention is worth a ton of code." -- an anonymous programmer

Working...