Comment Re:Melanoma is also possible without sun (Score 1) 148
When you're in the sun, you're damaging those cells *increasing* the chance of the damaged cells mutating into the above.
The sun isn't the sole cause.
It's full title is "Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment (Assistance and Access) Bill". The "other legislation" bit means that, in the future, other online services can be forced to install a back-door.
I've read most of the legislation draft, and if you read division 7 it says:
Division 7 — Limitations
317ZG Designated communications provider must not be required to implement or build a systemic weakness or systemic vulnerability etc.
(1) A technical assistance notice or technical capability notice must not have the effect of:
a requiring a designated communications provider to implement or build a systemic weakness, or a systemic vulnerability, into a form of electronic protection; or
b preventing a designated communications provider from rectifying a systemic weakness, or a systemic vulnerability, in a form of electronic protection.
(2) The reference in paragraph 1 a to implement or build a systemic weakness, or a systemic vulnerability, into a form of electronic protection includes a reference to implement or build a new decryption capability in relation to a form of electronic protection.
(3) The reference in paragraph 1 a to implement or build a systemic weakness, or a systemic vulnerability, into a form of electronic protection includes a reference to one or more actions that would render systemic methods of authentication or encryption less effective.
(4) Subsections (2) and (3) are enacted for the avoidance of doubt.
(5) A technical assistance notice or technical capability notice has no effect to the extent (if any) to which it would have an effect covered by paragraph
Wouldn't that mean that they cannot ask companies to build backdoors as that would weaken their systems?
Please use fewer 'junk' characters?? I've had to remove a lot of parenthesis from the legislation, so that's why it looks a little "off".
Second, no one keeps their firmware up to date, even if there exists firmware that does have all the fixes. The really fun part, companies that *do* routinely upgrade firmware get bitten when the vendor breaks them, and does so without a good rollback facility (after all, "downgrades" are a security risk, so a key change with a firmware update that *also* happens to be bad for your configuration, well sucks to be you).
Good example, I worked for a company that upgraded their HP branded Xenserver servers ILO firmware. When the servers rebooted it'd cause a kernel panic, nothing worked due to a bug in ILO or kernel module. Once we disabled the kernel module it booted again.
If they'd put that business model in front of me I'd run screaming the other way
It's been hypothesized their business model is to get critical mass where they can the be powerful enough to dictate to the cinemas how much it is per ticket. In the mean time they're throwing good money after bad.
However, facial recognition tech such as Apple's Face ID, which does not rely on visible light and uses depth perception, would not be tricked by juggalo makeup.
I read TFA sadly, but I don't understand why this sentence is in there - probably clickbait. The whole article is about surveillance and online face matching technology, and fooling it so it cannot identify you.
What I understand is if you wear the make-up and try to unlock your phone that uses image recognition, then it'll fail. You cannot unlock any phone using make-up. Besides there are easier methods.
expressing inevitable events.
Being inevitable should be viewed as an undertaking to the court right? So equal to a promise.
1 Billion dollars of budget deficit = 1 Gramm-Rudman