Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Open source money (Score 1) 81

Well, I'd say this interview really comes to a point not discussed too much. It's easy to be an extremist and say that everything should be open sourced and it's the solution to all world's software problems. The truth is different, however. Open source model works well and should be promoted in operating systems and hardware drivers plus a multitude of basic services (such as mail delivery, windowing system and GUI widget library). What I really can't see is what do hardware companies think, if they don't publish programming information or open source drivers for their products. That is a true win-win situation. They sell more hardware (they don't get any extra money for the drivers anyway) and the user is more safe with the thing - having the source means that you can always get someone port the drivers to your new system, if you have to change.
When it comes to application software, things are a bit different. Most applications really should NOT be designed by programmers, but people that have to use them. Another thing with open sourced apps is that you have millions of apps for the same purpose, which all have their own flaws, if nothing else, then rapidly changing configuration files and incompatible support libraries. It's really annoying to find a new RPM of your favourite app, and notice you'll have to update half your system. Using sources does not usually help, because the source won't compile unless you update something. All this is relatively easy if you have a fast link at home, but...
My conclusion: Open up OSes, drivers and services. That's what everybody owning a computer must have anyway. The companies would use their resources much more effectively in things that require usability study and involve large (complex) pieces of software.

--End this crap.

Slashdot Top Deals

She sells cshs by the cshore.

Working...