Yes. This is true.

I remember when Apple released an add showing how slow Intel chips were. Then I remember Apple showing an add showing how Intel chips were stuck doing boring things. Now Intel is making Apple Silicon. The times, they are a changing. I guess Steve Jobs was right, a loser now will be later to win.

I did not assume you traded stocks. I was telling you, your comment was telling me you shouldn't. That that you should stop. Your comment made it sound like you misread the TFS.

Please don't trade stocks mate. They stated in TFS how they are proposing to buy it.

Tell me you shouldn't trade stocks without telling me you shouldn't trade stocks.
$56B offer. Half cash means $28b. $20b from TD Bank and $8B from cash on hand.
The other $28b in GameStock stock presumably by issuing new stock.

After the Cold War, I am convinced if we want no more girl schools blown to bits, every country should have nuclear weapons. The only ones warrish enough to use them is us, really. Everyone else should have them to keep our stupid government at bay.

I was hesitant of the charge time fear, but having lives with an EV for 8 years (first Model X in 2018), I can say that the obsession with charge time is ridiculous unless you are a long haul trucker. My cars charge overnight, every night. I have a Tesla wall charger on every parking space in my garage, and my wife and I charge our cars to full, every night. I use a supercharger... 8 times a year? Seriously, how often do you drive 250+ miles a day? Even the Model 3's standard range cars do that. It is such a better way to live where every day you have a "full tank of gas" when you turn on your car. Not everyone can afford the capital outlay for solar panels, but we did and it makes our drives effectively free. Seriously, the maintenance, the running expenses, has all been unbelievable. Stop squeezing every ounce of longevity from your batteries and just accept the fact that you MUST sleep at some point, which is a great time to charge up your cars.

Dude. I'm so old I have actually used a VT100. I actually used a teletype for a few minutes for the heck of it. No punch cards, though.

I'm pretty clear on what a terminal emulator is. I've probably used one more days than not over my more than half century.

My point was: **We're totally ditching github!!** - and yet their website still links only to source on github.

Computers do think. Computers do not do consciousness. Consciousness is not a prerequisite to thinking. Thinking is a prerequisite to consciousness.

A surgeon is a skilled profession, not a knowledge profession. I won a court case with AI, when my lawyer was pushing us to settle. AI found an argument, and we got a positive result.

AI models are better than our ability to trust them. Already. They are certainly better than the average person in most knowledge professions, and for the few that it isnt, it's just a matter of time. Computers are better thinkers than we are. That is just obvious.

Huh. What's Ghostly?
* Click link -> https://ghostty.org/
* Clcik docs -> https://ghostty.org/docs
* Top right corner [ GitHub -> ] -> https://github.com/ghostty-org...

Nope.

No. Not while we have illegals to care for instead. We give them the benefits we should save for our citizens

This tax is not a billionaires tax. California has very strong safeguards around taxes. They have been trying to repeal prop13 for years. What this law actually says (which is never what its title is), states that the tax can be applied to anyone the legislature determines it should be applied to, so while its billionaires now, it will be you later on (if you live in CA). If you were a billionaire, you can just move. That is not who this law is targeting. Just like the income tax which was a tax on the ultra-rich, it will move down the ladder. If you support this law, history has taught you nothing. It will not give you free stuff, it will just lead to a larger government burden that provides very little from and takes a lot from everyone. Mark these words. Its on Page 27 of the bill if anyone wants to read it.

One problem with jurys in our hyper-polarized world is you can almost guess the outcome to a certainty based on where it is tried. If this was tried in Tennessee, my bet would be on Musk. Since it's in Oakland, Sam Altman will win.

I do think the slashdot crowd which is generally anti-Musk is rooting for a can of worms here. Do we really want to set Sam Altman's precedent which is that you can found a company as a non-profit and then decide way down the line to convert to for-profit? Because unlike S Corps, non-profits can have retained earnings.