Comment Re: So what (Score -1, Troll) 72
Comment Re:We'll see (Score 1, Interesting) 30
Flock is something each and every one of them will believe is good for the country because "terrorists" or "anti-semites". In reality, it's just so when they decide they dont like what you say, they will find a reason to come get you. America is dead, long live America.
Comment Re: Linux? (Score 1) 66
Comment Re: Huh? (Score 1) 49
Comment Re: We are also paying the Germans 1.2 billion (Score 5, Insightful) 139
Comment Re:Meaningless statements? (Score 1) 219
A camera only system can only be capable of superhuman performance if object recognition is at least as good as humans are capable of. Currently, computer vision systems are nowhere near as good as humans at that and probably won't be for a very long time.
Oh, no. I have it on good authority that computer vision is about to exceed human performance.
Wait - what year is it, again?
Comment Re:Huh? (Score 2) 49
Now, if they made it cheaper saying "Since we dont have to sell to retailers at bulk prices and can keep more of the profits", that would be extra cool, but its not like its worse.
Comment Re: Saw it. Didnâ(TM)t think it was real (Score 1) 66
Comment Saw it. Didnâ(TM)t think it was real (Score 1) 66
Comment Re:Have to wonder (Score -1, Troll) 69
Comment Re:It's not about dropping copper (Score 1) 65
Imagine 10,000 clusters of 20 homes. Each cluster no closer than 5 miles to.. anything. And all of them behind some mountain or in some valley or somewhere else that's really inconvenient. AI tells me you can run copper 5 miles without a booster - so that's what they did - sometime last century when they ran power. Work was cheap, copper was cheap, and someone was running power so they piggybacked. Easy peasy.
You can't run modern stuff nearly that far - except for fiber. But then you're running fiber to 10,000 hubs and each will probably need some kind of a station to do processing and splitting and further wires. I don't suppose any of this is hard - it's just expensive. And for each of these 10,000 hubs you're going to do all this work for 20 customers that only want to pay $10/month because that's their deal. You will *never* recoup those costs.
So I get why they don't wanna. But that's the deal they get for monopoly power and right of way and all that.
Comment It's not about dropping copper (Score 2) 65
This is not so much about dropping copper service as it is about dropping service. AT&T (or their predecessor) put in the copper and now they just want to drop those customers because they are expensive to maintain. I can't say I blame them - I would want to, too. The thing is they don't want to replace the copper with anything - they just want to ignore those folks.
The state would be more than happy if AT&T put in fiber and dropped copper. After all, they've secured tens of millions in California Advanced Services Fund (CASF) and Last Mile infrastructure grants
That's not what they signed up for when they were granted right of way and monopoly powers. They just want to weasel out of it.