Comment Re:Evolution/IEducation (Score 1) 792
Although the parent post uses the term "scientific method" directly,
the context speaks to a more fundamental notion than this "popular
methodology" as you describe it. That is, it speaks to the broader
concepts of rationality and logic (as opposed to other fundamental
types of belief, such as faith).
Are you suggesting also that this broader approach to understanding
(that is, rationality), should also be considered suspect, and treated
on an equal footing with faith-based (and potentially other) approaches?
It would seem quite clear that such an approach would quickly devolve
into linguistic indecision.
the context speaks to a more fundamental notion than this "popular
methodology" as you describe it. That is, it speaks to the broader
concepts of rationality and logic (as opposed to other fundamental
types of belief, such as faith).
Are you suggesting also that this broader approach to understanding
(that is, rationality), should also be considered suspect, and treated
on an equal footing with faith-based (and potentially other) approaches?
It would seem quite clear that such an approach would quickly devolve
into linguistic indecision.
