Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Australia

Ocean Energy Tech To Be Tested Off Australian Coast 103

cylonlover writes "The researchers at Australia's BioPower Systems evidently looked at kelp, and thought, 'what if we could use that swaying action to generate power?' The result was their envisioned bioWAVE system: 'At the base of each bioWAVE system would be a triangular foundation, keeping it anchored to the sea floor. Extending up from the middle of that foundation would be a central column, topped with multiple blades — these would actually be more like a combination of the kelp's blades and floats, as they would be cylindrical, buoyant structures that just reach to the surface. The column would join the foundation via a hinged pivot, allowing it to bend or swivel in any direction. Wave action (both at the surface and below) would catch the blades and push them back and forth, in turn causing the column to move back and forth relative to the foundation. This movement would pressurize fluid within an integrated hydraulic power conversion module, known as an O-Drive. The movement of that fluid would spin a generator, converting the kinetic energy of the waves into electricity, which would then be delivered to shore via subsea cables.'"

Comment Re:Sarbanes Oxley? (Score 1) 117

Actually, peer review is NOT very good at picking up premeditated, deliberate fraud by the submitting scientist. A good peer reviewer may notice inconsistencies that may require further investigation, but if the author really wants to fool the journal, they can. Even in this case, when a reviewer requested additional data, more fraudulent data was provided.

Unfortunately, what may be the long-term result is an unofficial embargo against Korean papers by the more prestigous journals. Journals receive papers with fantastic claims and conclusions all of the time, but unless the author is a well-known scientist, or from a well known lab or institution, these manuscripts get pitched.

Even today, journal editors are skeptical of papers from Russia or mainland China, not to mention countries with lesser scientific reputations. Decades ago, Japanese labs were in a similar position until they whipped themselves into shape.

Journals may now be thinking: if the highest-profile, best-funded lab in South Korea can't be trusted, and other Korean scientists couldn't be objective enough to detect such blatant fraud, why should we trust anything from that country?

Slashdot Top Deals

"Thank heaven for startups; without them we'd never have any advances." -- Seymour Cray

Working...