It sounds reasonable to me disclosing the leaker. The leaker is probably compensated to have if the company is selling Apple's newest prototype or soon to be released hardware in the Chinese market. The amusing thing is this letter goes nowhere because China notoriously only cares protecting their own interests from businesses to government to every day life. If China owned or sat on the board for Apple, it may be a different story. Slashdot's headline is propagandest because it demonstrates succinctly they do not see anything morally wrong of someone stealing property for personal gain instead demonizes Apple for trying to figure who is stealing their property.

I do not see the problem in offering dual licensing. It would solve this debate and all this discussion once and for all.