I have mixed feelings about this.
On the one hand, as a California (Bay Area) high tech worker, I do not use cash much these days. It's a PITA to get and all normal shops have e-payment options (have had them, for over a decade). Even the vendors at the local (in city) Farmers' Markets accept visa or venmo.
Yet I realize that I represent just one slice of the population and cash has been the dominant form of currency for centuries... These days its use seems correlated with folks earning cash from their jobs, and so denying such payments (and, hence, those people) is uncool.
Came here to say exactly that. There is something simple yet magical about locally-executed software that the new-age hip devs seems to forget: control. By that I mean the ability to run several browsers in different containers. Being able to save, backup and restore these environments. Being able to manage online identities. Being able to experiment with alternative browser engines.
But all of these are "power user features" today. It would be interesting to know how many people are logged into Google permanently and just use Chrome all day long. I am sure that is common, but it should not be the norm.
Skeptic in me says they have ulterior motives
I am sure they do... yet this feature is not visible to end-user really. Well, they will probably add a little line item or an icon to indicate that the inbound delivery was secured. Yet that has little to do with the email's content which, by definition, is either transferred from GMail's storage or transferred into it.
In these matters the only certainty is that there is nothing certain. -- Pliny the Elder