
I work in the HPC world, and there's plenty of interest for these skills outside of defense and financial. I agree that a lot of it is gov't funded, but locations like NCSA, which are in the process of finalizing acceptance of a huge system from Cray that has GPUs, some of the DOE national labs, or even NASA, are always looking for people like this and have mostly pure scientific agendas. Also, NVidia has been posting a lot lately looking for applications folks.
There's plenty of interesting work, it just takes a little to find it. Check out HPC specific job boards, like the HPCWire Job Bank, for example, or check out the jobs pages of places like NCSA, the DOE labs (LBL, LLNL, etc), NASA, or companies like Cray, NVidia, even Intel, since MIC is coming soon, and will likely be similar to a GPU in how it's programmed.
For his part Breton hasn't sent a work email in three years. 'If people want to talk to me, they can come and visit me, call or send me a text message. Emails cannot replace the spoken word.'
Yes, any change to how the internet works could increase phishing. But at $185,000 per application for a new TLD, as well as having each application reviewed by a human or committee, this isn't going to be like automating the registration of
Yes, yes, everything can increase the risk of cancer in lab rats, and everything increases the risk of phishing, but the barrier for entry is set relatively high here.
Fundamentally there's something wrong with a corporation as large as Starbucks being unable or unwilling to pay for models or get permission directly from the person whom they're wanting to feature.
They don't want to pay for anonymous models. They want all your friends to know you go to Starbucks in the hopes that subconsciously it will make them more likely to go next time they want coffee -- they are using the ads as a form of reference -- "I like Starbucks, you should check it out."
As for getting your permission, you opted in to Facebook, so you gave FB permission to do whatever they want with anything you put there. While it feels more intrusive because it's your face on the screen, it's not really much different (on a technical level) than a company selling your email and contact info to affiliates.
Those stories about the great privacy terms violations said that Zynga, via Farmville, was a big offender (the story linked to in the back link to the older Slashdot article says this, in fact).
I wonder if they say "anyone who grabs the UID is punished" b/c that freed up some of their biggest developers, like Zynga, who were doing other bad stuff, but not that bad (for some subjective definition of bad)?
He was a superstar manager. If HP's financial performance suffers without Hurd, they could lose tens of billions of dollars in market cap. If that happens I have to think that investors are going to question whether that $20k was worth it.
I don't disagree that he has been an amazing manager at HP, helping to turn things around after the mess that was Carly Fiorina.
However, how much corruption is too much to overlook? Where do you draw that line? He falsified records to get expenses paid out to himself and/or this woman for $20k, and when caught red-handed, offered to pay it back. Ok, but what if he wasn't caught? Would he have kept doing it? Would he have done it with some other woman? What happens if he wasn't caught until the total was in the millions? Would that have still been ok, because a couple million is still less than tens of billions in market cap?
What is the value of corporate officers acting honestly no matter what?
Do you even know who Jonathan Corbet is? Among other things, he created LWN.net, has been a Linux kernel contributor for longer than that, and has written books on Linux kernel development (for example, the O'Reilly "Linux Device Drivers" book).
He's been on the inside for a long time. This is an opinion you should at least respect, even if in the end you disagree.
/. car analogy warning: would you rather buy a car from a company that treated a recall about the engine exploding and killing you the same way they treat a recall about the light in the trunk failing?
I don't think your analogy is right. Think of it more like the company that produces a car engine and doesn't necessarily make sure every person understands whether it's the engine spontaneously catching fire or the finish peeling. They say "this is the list of shit we fixed" and articulate everything they fixed and how they fixed it.
You bet your ass that Toyota will tell you if it's an exploding problem or a finish peeling problem. The distros, in every update, will tell you what bugs were patched, and their severity, as they should. Should it be up to the kernel team to notify every user, or the distros?
Some people can install their own engine in a car. Some people like to download their own kernels and install them; those people probably can read CHANGELOGs.
The summary was a unclear to me -- these weren't built for or affiliated with the movie in any way, these were simply built based on the specs of the models built for the movie.
So that would mean that every active user would spend almost 1 1/2 hours per day surfing that site. On average. Which falls for me in the "bullshit" category. Just totally unbelievable.
Why is this unbelievable? Just because you don't play games on the site for 3 hours a day doesn't mean other people don't...
* UNIX is a Trademark of Bell Laboratories.