The sensitive device will annoy customers of the emitting device too though. So a highly *successful* sensitive device could impose a de facto RF emissions limit in its market that was lower than the regulatory one.

"multimodal multitouch gaming"???? Sod that. How about... "Two pods, one pad".

a line:
______________________

a "ring" called "A":
__A_____A_____________

and another "ring" called "B":
__A_____A___B_____B__

lift "B" into the second dimension:
_____________B_____B__
__A_____A_____________

slide "B" across:
_____B_____B___________
__A_____A_____________

drop "B" back onto the line:
__A__B__A__B_________

"A" and "B" are now "linked" in the 1D universe.

A turing machine isn't just the head and the tape, its those things plus a state transition table. The microcontroller is doing the state transition table part.

By "workaround" he didn't mean a technical solution where you implement something different to avoid infringment. He meant a legal solution where you look for an argument that says you're not infgringing.

Someone had a causal theory that corruption was responsible for certain voting patterns. They invented a test that could perhaps falsify the theory. The test did not falsify the theory.

Is it proved? No. But the correlation (failure to falsify) makes it a reasonable thing to believe unless/until it goes down to a better theory or a better test.