Actually, the story I submitted was around their detection of spam levels coming back up to the pre-McColo shutdown. I commented on this one since it seemed that someone thought that Symantec was trying to "look better" than their competitors.
Statistics has taught me one thing: Having a larger sample set gives you better results.
My source for numbers in my comment:
http://www.symantec.com/about/profile/technology.jsp
"The Symantec Global Intelligence Network encompasses worldwide security intelligence data gathered from a wide range of sources, including more than 40,000 sensors monitoring networks in more than 180 countries through Symantec products and services such as Symantec DeepSightâ Threat Management System and Symantec Managed Security Services, and from other third-party sources."
Further down in that link, lets see...
Malicious Code Reports from over 120 million clients, 25,000 vulnerabilities from over 20 years affecting 55,000 different technologies, from 8,000 vendors. Oh yea, they also operate BugTraq.
How does this compare to Arbor?
Oh that's right, they didn't state their capabilities in the article or on their website that I could see.