Inteeeresssssting.... Inteeeresssssting.... indeed (Score 1)

(b) Kalem Co. v. Harper Brothers, 222 U.S. 55, does not support respondents' novel theory that supplying the "means" to accomplish an infringing activity and encouraging that activity through advertisement are sufficient to establish liability for copyright infringement.

Would the MPAA and RIAA have you believe that? I think not.