Re:This shows a misunderstanding of ID (Score 1)

True, but what ID people will point out, is that the complexity of the thing being produced is unimaginably complex and well-designed and couldn't be produced within a reasonable amount of time going on chance alone. The point I was trying to make wasn't that anyways, it was that the author felt that the theory was somehow linked to the idea the science can't understand the universe as is. ID theory doesn't really depend upon whether scientific theory can understand the universe...in fact the more complex and understanding we have of it, the more they'll point to the FACT that the universe isn't simple, but has a complex design--hence designer(s).