::: The threats are being named to perpetuate an indulgence racket where we should've switched vendors ages ago
So you are saying with the ‘right’ vendor, APT’s will stop?::::The risk to our systems is irrelevant in the face of our unwillingness to do what really needs to be done.
So what really needs to be done?
I think you are getting caught up in the semantics.
Hackers, crackers, etc...whatever you want to call them.
APT - really does not matter how we define it, focus on the outcome. Our systems are at risk.