That is the most ridiculous bad science I've ever seen.

What's CONICET contribution to science? How many publications, patents, etc? More importantly, how does the work of CONICET translate to improvement in the industry, more jobs, better lives for Argentinians, etc? I bet very little. The most crucial problem in Argentina now is government spending, with 40% of the population working for the government. Nothing else is more urgent than fixing that. Once the 140% inflation is controlled, the fiscal is in order again, and the government can reinvest in critical sectors.

Big pharma, big tobacco, big coffee, and now the big plant-based.

Totally agree with you about Bolsonaro About the corruption story you mention, I assume you are talking about Petrobras and the lava-jato. Well if you don't believe it you must have a very good fantasy to explain how billions were recovered or why most people arrested return millions and millions. Just on Petrobras director returned 300 million to the justice. Perhaps you must stop reading the worker party web site.

You don't live in the cold war era. Three days ago Mr. Bolsonaro was visting Russia, that's doesn't seem the thing a USA puppet would do, specially considering the current Russia Ukraine issue. It wasn't Wall Street that brought Lula down, it was Lula government the corruption that brought him down. But don't worry, the corruption always win in latin america, Lula is back.

The Amazon is 3x the size of Alaska. Most countries can't enforce its own laws and end drug traffic, weapons, even traffic of people. But you think controlling the Amazon deforestation is easier

Coffee now became the new global warming villain? Developed countries keep trying to put the blame of global warming on developing nations.

It is complicated. Beef production is a close cycle. Cows generate CO2 previously sequestered and accumulated by plants used in their diet. Beef packs a lot of nutrients and energy in a small volume. You get much more energy from 200g of beef than from 200g of broccolis or carrots. Thus when transporting beef to the consumer you use less fuel to transport more energy than when transporting vegs products. Grass-fed cattle is even benefit to the environment because does the natural cycle of carbon captured by grass - ruminant feeding - fertilizing the soil. Besides, grass-fed beef must cycle the use of the fields, allowing the pasture to recover naturally Plant base alternatives for red meat are highly industrialized types of food with the same problems: for instance high levels of sodium.

I suppose the carbon ingested by animals comes from carbon captured by the grass and grains used to feed them. So it is a close circuit. This is completely different than CO2 that comes from fossil fuels There is also the fact meat packs a lot more calories in a smaller volume, it means a lot less CO2 in transportation for the same amount of calories. Cattle feeds from a lot of things not suitable as human food.

The WFH policy without a pay cut adjustment has shown to cause huge impacts in the economy of lower cost places. Idaho included.

What? So Bezos is responsible for solving "wars, wealth inequality, racism" problems on earth? Imagine the world now if we had listened to the same complains in the 60s and 70s

The richer the miner the more hardware he/she can buy thus gets more coins. Nothing changes

No one will replace them because any other business model won't be realistic, so let's get back to the old taxi model and its bigger costs. The customer will loose, the drivers will loose. Only taxi companies and taxi unions will win.

Not only automation can do better, it can avoid human error. Nowadays, most accidents are caused by human error. Look what that guy in Pakistan did to put down the 737