Excellently executed

You misunderstand what a free market is.

Free market means that governments or regulatory bodies cannot set the PRICE of goods and services. There's nothing wrong in setting minimum acceptable standards.

Ex: Sure.. mandate $150/Hr. then businesses can choose to either sell at existing price+$150, get rid or replace some employees and sell at same price.

Get it? the final PRICE is what's free to be decided by businesses.

Minimum wage and free markets can co-exist. Imagine if businesses said "Hurr-durr how dare government say I have to keep my premises clean huh? this is a free market dammit!"

whoa whoa... twitter is both useless AND evil (on an average)

..... to a real life skyrim experience

I'm Indian and I find this absolutely hilarious.. Should I be offended? Naa.. I've seen too many applicants use similar language... I will however laugh uncontrollably for the next 5 minutes at that name... Mahindresh Jalabahamatra

S for Sherlock please

nearest loo located.. 15Km away.. only 2 hrs walk.. would you like to turn on navi-oh you already shit ur pants.. ok nvm

This name pattern just works.

If investors are seeing unicorns frolicking everywhere, Silicon valley has a dope ass medical-grade LSD supply goin on.

*first few..

With the latest z3 series I truly feel sorry for sony. I have a z3 compact and I cant for the love of god understand why this phone isnt selling like the first gew iphones during their prime. from what I can see, it seems like their advertising and marketing strategy sucks donkey balls (yes that's what I said). The new phones have features..useful ones at that..that no other phone has (by default.. obviously all features can be ported across in android).. like the glove mode in snowy weather.. the timeshift burst camera... the answering machine in the default phone app... NOBODY seems to know about this stuff.... Instead, all their ads talk like hopped up fashion models... come on sony. learn from samsung ..only their ad strategy,.. not their phone making skills..

hey that's right! so it would depend on just using the right pixels for the correct eye depending on the direction of the observers head.. recording-wise you'd just need one 360degree camera... right?

True.. I suppose we'd have to add restrictions for movies where you want the action is happening at a set minimum distance from the observer (camera) and anything that gets closer will have to .... well.. disappear... yeah i see what you mean by hacky.. I do think it might be sufficient for movies/stories ....

partly yes.. though it may not be necessary for the system to "switch" between cameras since this isnt live (direct from the camera in real-time) 360degree 3d we're talking about... you'd need one video stream for the sphere of view of the left eye.. and another stream for the sphere of view of the right eye they'd have to be constructed and stiched together like panorama or photosphere pictures beforehand (unless you have some really powerful computers doing the conversion in real time.. though not necessary for a movie) So it would boil down to the system (occulus..gearVR etc) doing the calculation of which part of the sphere to be shown based on the orientation of the head of the viewer.. and do this fast enough that he/she cannot notice any lag between head motion and video motion...

This should be simple right? use 2 sets of cameras to record from 2 points of view lightly offset from each other to give the viewer some parallax and hence the illusion of 3D.... I mean 1 set(8..10..9000 how many ever necessary) of cameras for the left eye video, and another set for the right eye video...