Yeah, this will be interesting. Either Red Hat wins, and other people start following suit, supposedly finding a way to make GPL software semi-proprietary... or Red Hat loses, and a precedent is set that this is /not/ how things work in the Linux world. This is SCO-drama 2.0

Hey, I'm just speculating what Red Hat's angle is likely going to be. I believe the GPL supersedes any license Red Hat is stacking on top of it, but they're trying to tap the distributors (of distributions) and trying to have a leg to stand on so they can say "you acquired that source code through a breach of contract with our customers, please stop using it." I don't think they care about where it came from or who is doing the leaking. I think Red Hat just wants to say "you built a distribution from source code that was given to our customers under a breached contract." It is very SCO-ish.

Yeah, my thoughts exactly. How much is GNU profiting from Red Hat using their code?

Don't think they're going after any potential leakers. Fingerprinting or identifying where the leak is coming from is probably not high on the list. This is more so Red Hat can say "You appear to be building from illegally distributed source code, please stop." They're going after the distributors, not the leakers.

Yes, I realize this. However if we're after the original theatrical releases (the topic at hand), Jabba was nowhere to be found.

Jabba wasn't originally in ANH.

Just make 'em theme-able. Sell themed crash screens on the Windows store for 99 cents.

You wouldn't steal a car

No, but I would download one if I could.

What does this say about Duke Nukem Forever?