Journal: IP and genetics:survival traits of DRM active people

Something about genetics and statistics here. Intellectual property being a genetic trait of the human organism.
I would, and do, argue that all human knowledge will traverse all humans in a distilled, misinterpreted fashion over some period of time. The likeness of the IP recieved/observed/grok'd will aproximate the original based on proximity of disclosure and number of interpretations observed before consideration. Also, long before conscious realization of the thoerem/mechanics/method/concept in question, many uses of the INVENTION/WORK will be reiterated by the subconscious. It is important to understand that EVERYONE has those GEOMETRY/SITUATIONAL dreams (a construct of bizzare permutations of real experience by our subconcious)that LATER allow them to problem solve or create in a new way, and in a way that a mid African monkeys know how to catch and eat coastal crabs. OR allows Bollywood to use Japanese Punk Rock, but not American Punk Rock musical constructs thus deriving Punk Rock but not from the Brits.

Simply being aware that knowledge and art are facets of our subconscious creative mind will show you that all knowledge is Individual Intellectual Property only as long as the individual secrets the knowledge, immediately upon sharing or EXPRESSING the concept, public domain powers of inertia start to build. I should say that creating a painting does not teach anyone how to master a new brush stroke, but once SHARED it sure as heck does, and there is no stopping them(anyone) from spontaneously deriving the CONCEPT 7.7 from BRUSH STROKE DEMO v.999.

So, DRM or not. My consideration is that IP laws protect knowledge that has already been given to THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. The essential problem is that we are trying to use behavior modification (legislation) to control genetics(human survival) without a clear understanding of human learning, psychology, mutation or inheritance(as they apply genetically), on the Humane Organism against all laws of survival and nature.

Apparently, the Democratic-Representative ..8p.. Capitalistic Bean Counter Governments..*8p...and (well distributor, promoter, producer) think they are in a position to value fair compensation for thought. hmm. All humans think all the time, and if we all learn without intention, and our creative subconscious hallways interprets and reapplies.. then essentially the value of original thought is nothing unless we use or teach it WELL. Kind of like getting graded for being human.

SO .. how long do you get your +5 income modifier? heh.. as long as you use it and somebody cares. The powers that be will come to understand this, as will market forces define this for RIAA and all representative resellers of original thought. Unfortunately for me, the consumer and the PARTNER THINKER, I am developing an antisurvival instinct by being associated with the losing team of RIAA, SBA, and MPIAA, and most GOVm't PATENT AND TRADEMAARK OFFICES.

If, as humans, we were capable of valuing these things correctly then the US patent and trade office may as well just pay us directly on submission. Unfortunately for those who would do well in this environment, the USPTO is only responsible for cataloging, not for market performance. They cannot pay for what marketing/sales/manufacturing you may or may not do or others derive from what you have done. They themselves cponclude they are not competant to assign value.

The legislatures/lobbyist/judges of america think they are. There is no INHERENT RIGHT TO YOUR IP. There is a HUMANE right to it and IT WILL BE ABSORBRED (what do the BOrg say?) ASSIMILATED, that I GARUANTEE, unless you ostracize yourself. FULL WARRANTY IMPLIED. It is a matter of survival. So what we have here, is an ability to sell at market value, survival techniques. To the highest bidder, so the law of club and fang states. Beyond that, we have those that cannot survive on there own, buying and selling concepts and most importantly spending there earnings trying to lobby judges and present to stockholders a better return on the value of there ineptitude.

How long will the weak allow themselves to be ruled by people that would squeeze there thoughts for all value that can be sold from it and all derivative works?

I can only follow myself up by saying that the DRM that is implanted in media today may not be compatible with OS's in the future. That puts a LIFESPAN on media trusted to the makers and supporters of DRM. To bad that the internet will always be the genetic knowledge gene pool of the human race. Stupid librarians. They trusted the bookstore. Good thing USPTO was created after the founding fathers otherwise their works would have been lost or by now.