Comment Complete Overreation (Score 1) 593
The document in question (did anyone actually read the document that the blog refers to, not just the blog itself...or maybe even that much is charitable) clearly applies to those who have security clearances. And while it is a little bit excessive, it is not entirely inappropriate in that case to mention a word of concern to the person in question's security officer.
There are lots of people who don't meet these requirements (myself included) and don't get a security clearance; or at least not much of one.
There are lots of people who don't meet these requirements (myself included) and don't get a security clearance; or at least not much of one.
