Assange targeted while Aust./UK crimes concealed (Score 1)

Hardly surprising that the ‘Australian Foreign Affairs Says UN Assange Ruling Not Binding’ when Australian laws enforced by authorities appointed by Australian governments aren’t even considered to be legally binding. An example being the false records of Australian newspapers published fraudulently sold by Australian state & national public libraries as authentic ‘archives’ of newspapers published. – The sale of false records as authentic archives is not a crime according to Australia’s Consumer protection law enforcement authorities. The fake archives assist to conceal Australian government[s’] [of both political parties], law enforcement and news media crimes, maladministration & corruption. News articles published have been erased or altered for the false records. UK PM Cameron & his government considers the assistance Ecuador has provided to Assange as worthy of a UK Foreign Office official diplomatic complaint but is silent on the evidence of fake ‘archives’ of newspapers being imported from Australia [sold by British Libraries UK London] & not worthy of any complaint. The UK’s & Australian governments share the common circumstances of being dependent on Murdoch news media to be elected. The Australian crimes, corruption & maladministration concealed by fake newspaper archives (of national significance & costing billions of dollars) concern events in the state of South Australia where Rupert Murdoch began his media empire with the first newspaper he ever owned & where he maintains a newspaper publishing state monopoly. More information & documents [the evidence] at https://rjrbtsrupertsfirstnews... UK PM Cameron, who has decided to renege on his commitment to proceed with the Leveson [Part 2] Inquiry into UK media crimes, is capable of asking his friend Rupert Murdoch about his involvement in his news media's concealing serious crimes by the use of fake 'archives' of his newspapers published, but appears reluctant to do so, preferring to betray citizens of the UK. The BBC, being merely a representative of the UK government & not independent, has no objections to the deception of UK taxpayers.