The part you quote contains a link to another article describing levitating "ants, beetles, spiders, ladybugs, bees, tadpoles, and fish," but that levitation was done using ultrasound, not magnetism.

Better would be "Entertainment Weekly snubs science books in 100-best list."

EW isn't bemoaning anything. The article contains no analysis of the list. The entire article is nothing but the list. EW isn't claiming to have a standing to complain about anything about the list.

The headline at EW is "The New Classics: Books." That isn't making any suggestion at all. It's nothing but a couple of noun phrases.

Maybe the headline should have been "Slashdot article submitter bemoans lack of great science books on Entertainment Weekly's list."