Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Get HideMyAss! VPN, PC Mag's Top 10 VPNs of 2016 for 55% off for a Limited Time ×

Comment Ex Post Facto laws forbidden by US Constitution (Score 1) 296

Sen. Burr must not be up to date on his constitutional law. The constitution expressly forbids ex post facto laws, which are defined as laws "that retroactively change the legal consequences (or status) of actions that were committed, or relationships that existed, before the enactment of the law." From Wikipedia: "Ex post facto laws are expressly forbidden by the United States Constitution in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3 (with respect to federal laws) and Article 1, Section 10 (with respect to state laws)." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Comment Science needs funding (Score 1) 281

This has been alluded to, but the real issue here isn't whether scientists are going to be persuaded to alter their pursuits. Rather, it's how non-scientists perceive the value of scientists. And, when most scientists are funded by non-scientists (i.e. all of us, through our taxes), this can have a profound effect on whether scientists can continue their work.

Submission + - New Open Development Platform on World's Largest EHR 1

rickyb writes: Epic, the largest electronic health record used by 51% of the US and 2.4% of the world, has just announced a new, open platform for mobile development at their annual User Group Meeting in Verona, WI. It's available at http://open.epic.com./ Right now it's geared towards mobile apps and the medical devices that connect to them, but it appears that additional APIs will shortly be made available. As a physician and developer, this is exciting in the sense that we now have a way to connect these innovations to over half the US population. However, being tied to one vendor, this is still not the truly open platform desired by physicians across the country. What apps will you create?

Comment There's a problem on both ends (Score 5, Insightful) 294

Yes, some physicians will abuse the system. Some will do so willingly, while others will do so out of ignorance. However, many physicians at large academic medical centers (also known as "residents"), are not taught how to code and bill at all until they reach independent practice. This leads to very bad habits and often to underbilling quite significantly for their services. They all do the work, but don't appreciate the importance of recording and documenting the work for billing purposes, leaving money on the table. This impacts primary care most of all, where margins are very slim, and many physicians are struggling to remain solvent. EMRs actually take care of the coding and billing far more efficiently and accurately than the physicians themselves. But as the saying goes, "garbage-in, garbage-out." The coding is only as accurate as the physician documentation. The vast majority of physicians do not intentionally document erroneously to inflate billing - once the error is pointed out to them, they are more than willing to fix it. And for those physicians who are maliciously abusing the system, there's no better solution than EMRs to record and track this behavior.

Comment Re:100% Accurate, Nearly All of the Time! (Score 1) 138

Exactly. Especially in medicine, no diagnostic test can ever be considered 100% accurate unless it could be tested on every single person who ever had the disease in question and who ever will have the disease. Try getting funding for that! Any article (or summary of an article) discussing the statistics of a diagnostic test should also include mention of the specificity and sensitivity of the test. Biostats 101, guys (and gals).

Slashdot Top Deals

!07/11 PDP a ni deppart m'I !pleH

Working...