Will apple also be warned about their cameras? https://yro.slashdot.org/story... Seems like another big company doing nothing to assuage public concern.

It is quite telling that billionaire CEOs want to do even LESS work and receive more compensation. Zuck is openly expressing that he can be replaced by an AI, but then he still wants to receive all the monies. This is not a luxury extended to the average person. An AI generated to replace the average person would results in termination. If Zuck wants to go down this road, he should be laid off and put the AI in charge.

Uh oh! This is worse than the routers problem. Time to ban PLCs! /s

Pretty sure xAI won't feel the same way and would prefer a complete hands-off approach as long as the money comes rolling in.

Me. It's been my daily driver for years and I've never had any issues. I think they're doing a great job!

Came here to say this! Meta is doing it with their AI engagement.. why not Google too?

They will be showing AI generated clothing on AI generated models. So they aren't showing the actual product. What if the color isn't as vibrant, or has a different sheen or just hangs different due to the fabric density. This seems like a terrible experience for the customer.

Too bad there's not an easy way to spin up a Public Benefit Corporation or co-op to step in and take over Intel with opposite effect of a VC buyout. It's just very difficult to pull off. Honestly, I would suspect Elon to bid on it. He has the money and he loves the power and influence, even if it's not a directly profitable endeavor. Imagine him owning all the biggest american industries - space, cars, chips, social media. That is a little disturbing, but honestly, what alternatives for a buyout are there these days besides VC or oligarch? We're in a weird timeline.

ChatGPT is just regurgitating what is already available online.

I don't necessarily agree they are immediately better. You're moving "something you know" to "something you have". For some people, this might be better, but as a whole, you're leaving out a very important part of the security equation.

One thing that's great about Mint is that it's easy to use and has some of the feel of Windows, which makes it easy for novices to move from Windows to Linux (it's really all about Cinnamon). This is what advantages it brings to the table.. familiarity and comfort. Hope more Windows users explore Linux, and Mint is a great place to start.

What's crazy is they are praising the kiosks as creating more jobs. That's totally disingenuous. The kiosks reduce labor. By total coincidence, around the same time, mobile ordering has become popular. So they needed to hire people to cover that demand. If the kiosks had been introduce a decade ago, or a decade from now, there would be no new trend to offset the loss of jobs. It's total capitalist spin.

China is perfectly capable of building their own chips, this will just further divide technology across the globe.

This! They aren't even using landlines anymore. They're just using regular internet traffic these days, so their costs have probably dropped. They're literally just skimming off the top for doing very little (in most cases).

Takedown requests are already too easy to abuse. Sadly, it seems most requests aren't even properly reviewed before they are submitted. These "rights holders" are essentially asking for the power to take any site/stream/page offline immediately without oversight by anybody. Since restoration typically doesn't happen instantaneously in the case of error or malicious intent, it's somewhat unfair. It doesn't "cost" these companies anything if a stream stays active (no one can even go buy cable immediately to continue watching). But, a mistake filed against a youtube or twitch stream could cost the creator thousands of dollars in income. Seems pretty unfair.