In any writing, feedback is the most important resource you can use to improve your document. That's where education needs to lend itself, in collaboration. When I was in school, a person would basically write whatever, and a teacher would give your grade, nothing more nothing less. I think the peers need to be versed on the rules of the game (grammar), and then they can do their jobs of helping to help you project meaning, flow, etc. There is nothing better than this. Matter of fact, science sort of works this way: let your peers review, knowing that you both understand the rules (scientific methods), and come up with better, and ongoing threads. Sorry i posted AC at first. .

NPR's story would seem to disagree that the INTERNET speaks only standard English. http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2010/04/30/126420060/bridging-the-online-language-barrier-translating-the-internet

if ((story != open source)(isM$)(avg(scorepoints) = 3))
{
      return string ("Microsoft did something good, even though it took them a while?");
}