Comment This is not a transcript (Score 2) 704
Can we use some other term, PLEASE?
Can we use some other term, PLEASE?
The tools we used to do this are at https://github.com/openssl/too...
please contact license@openssl.org so we can make sure we handle your contributions properly.
CFRG meeting. Mixing post-QC RNG into the TLS pre-master secret.
Forward secrecy even if QC cracks RSA or ECC.
"the notification is of no use to me." Then ignore/killfile the notifications. But many others see benefit from advance notice and starting to crank up their patch machinery. Even if they end up not patching, they seem to find it worthwhile as "disaster prep."
This is wrong. We're not trying to protect against National-Scale Adversaries, who probably have all the traffic the want, anyway. immediate full disclosure means that any script kiddie or criminal gets access immediately. That would be bad.
Emilia from the OpenSSL team just published a good blog post that explains some of the "twists" of logjam, and also what OpenSSL is doing about it. It's here: http://openssl.org/blog/blog/2...
A friend's kid was watching the tracker. His network glitched and for a minute he got the [X] icon instead of the sleigh image. He started crying that Santa got blown up.
Someone sent me a copy:
From uunet!research.att.com!dmr Tue Oct 17 03:35:50 1989
Return-Path:
Received: from uunet.UUCP by world.std.com (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AA27107; Tue, 17 Oct 89 03:35:50 EDT
From: uunet!research.att.com!dmr
Received: from inet.att.com by uunet.uu.net (5.61/1.14) with SMTP
id AA15993; Tue, 17 Oct 89 03:21:50 -0400
Message-Id:
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 89 03:15:37 EDT
To: msgs@world.std.com
Subject: printf
"Hello, world.std.com!\n"
Dennis Ritchie
You're already carrying the sphere!