Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Be glad you're not in Canada (Score 2, Informative) 555

by rhpenguin (#30032000) Attached to: Verizon Droid Tethering Comes At a Hefty Price
Well, I am in Canada. I'm on Telus. I have an unlimited data plan that actually is unlimited and it costs me $45/mo. I easily use 25GB of data a month (tethering included) and still just pay that $45 fee.

Good plans are out there, you just have to find them. Canadian carriers don't make it easy.

Comment Re:What uses so much data? (Score 1) 501

by rhpenguin (#29705135) Attached to: Why AT&T Should Dump the iPhone's Unlimited Data Plan
I don't have an iPhone, but I do have an HTC Touch. I use about 15GB/month of data (incoming/outgoing) on my phone. This is mostly because I stream music a minimum of 9 hours a day at work and while I'm driving. I also surf on the phone and tether for occasional web surfing on the go when I need the real web. I also get all my e-mail from several accounts, attachments too.

It adds up quick.

Comment My oldest tech, a pinball machine. (Score 1) 622

by rhpenguin (#28128829) Attached to: 45-Year-Old Modem Used To Surf the Web
The oldest tech gear I use on a daily basis is the MPU board in my 1980 Stern Seawitch pinball machine. The serial number is quite low, so it was made in 1980 at some point and still works like the day it was made. It's received some TLC over the years, but.. rock solid reliable.

Before that, my oldest tech would have been the MPU in my 1978 Stern Lectronamo. It's since been sold to make way for other machines.

Check out Seawitch:
http://ipdb.org/search.pl?searchtype=advanced&mpu=34#2089
The Courts

Submission + - Appeals Court Says RIAA Hearing Can't be Streamed (blogspot.com)

Submitted by
NewYorkCountryLawyer
NewYorkCountryLawyer writes: "The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has overturned a lower court order permitting webcast of an oral argument in an RIAA case, SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum, in Boston. As one commentator put it, the decision gives the RIAA permission to 'cower behind the same legal system they're using to pillory innocent people'. Ironically, the appeals court's own hearing had been webcast, via an mp3 file. The court admitted that this was not an appropriate case for a 'prerogative writ' of 'mandamus', but claimed to have authority to issue a writ of 'advisory mandamus'. The opinion came as a bit of a surprise to me because the judges appeared, during the oral argument, to have a handle on the issues. The decision gave me no such impression. From where I sit, the decision was wrong in a number of respects, among them: (a) it contradicted the plain wording of the district court rule, (b) it ignored the First Amendment implications, and (c) there is no such thing as 'advisory' mandamus or 'advisory' anything — our federal courts are specifically precluded from giving advisory opinions."

Slashdot Top Deals

Advertising is the rattling of a stick inside a swill bucket. -- George Orwell

Close