But emergency rooms are still required to treat the grievously injured, insured or not. What if there had been a life on the line, someone trapped inside the building. Does some kid have to die because his dad was to cheep or too stupid to pay a fee?
I understand why this happened this way but I don't see why it couldnt be structured differently. If wilderness rescue can charge a lost hiker for finding them without that hiker having to pay a $75 fee ahead of time just in case they get lost, why cant the fire department charge someone who didn't pay the fee up front. Obviously the fee for putting out the fire should be a lot more than what the person would pay if they just paid in advance but it should be an option.
pets died. Granted that they're not people, but a life is a life. The pets (and even children) would have no choice in the matter as to whether their owner/parent paid the fees. I agree that everyone should pay their dues. Having a welfare state is not good. However, I also believe that we as humans and neighbors should be willing to help out in dire situations such as this. I think the damage caused by the fire to this point and then to the house, far outweighed a $75 bill. Also, we really don't have all the info around what that bill was do we? Was it specifically for fire related services? or was it a parking ticket? Are we really going to let someone's house burn over an unpaid parking ticket in the future?
My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells down by the seashore.