Since no evidence has been presented to show any bias or that these were not the best people in their respective field, your premise is that it is best to force diversity over merit? Okay where do we draw the line? Race? Sex? Religion? Nation? Skin color since there are many hues of all races? Ideology? Height? Weight? Social credit score? Where do you draw the line since apparently the idea of putting together the best minds is not the way to shape the future. Now I will admit, I do not know these people's qualifications vs others that were available at the time. However, unlike the poster and you it seems, I did not instantly jump to the conclusion that is bias or completely lacking bias. However, its not on me to prove the theory, its on the original poster who failed miserably.

Not entirely correct. White = bad. Male = bad. White male = super bad.

So where do you discuss or point out or cite that these people are not the BEST at what they do and just happen to be white males? Or are you saying that forced diversity is better than merit? I seriously hope not. Otherwise you are right there is racism/sexism but its not Zuckerburg that is the racist and sexist.