I fucked your wife and burned down your house, AND launched 2 rockets. Yet you treat me with disdain.

Phew thanks for reassuring us that you're a very special, one in a thousand person, and that you're objectively using this stuff correctly, We needed that reinforcement.

The headline feels less like the posing of a premise and more like an honest solicitation for information on the subject.

If fucking morons can't use their product OpenAI has a big problem

Bet they also want to cure vacation and breaks

When?

I also firmly believed in the right to own operate and modify a computer, but that it has resulted in this comment makes me wonder if I'm entirely right. You're very stupid.

The ones I know certainly see themselves as Warren Buffet types, regardless of their actual behavior.

I believe you're a lawyer insofar as you didn't address what you're pretending to address and are sympathetic to the wealthy and powerful. The fact remains that damages can be rationally and provably assessed, as in the given example of a specific process causing net loss. I expect that in court the oil companies will have someone similarly diatribe about oil not being evil, or some other non sequitur that injects moral ambiguity into a straightforward matter. Or pretend that meaningful regulation is an existential threat to an industry you are simultaneously describing as inevitable.

Bringing up Socialism makes me feel like you misunderstood what I said or what Socialism is. You'll have to clarify your derision for me to respond properly.

These are a baseless and rambling series of statements having nothing to do with my point that the Executive was at least envisioned as a relatively powerless position, focused on administration. I know your purpose is to muddy the waters and generate outrage but I like responding to things like this as if you were a rational being. Please feel free to make any other observations about me and I'll review them when I have time.

You're being sarcastic but that is literally how the system was designed. Your tone makes you seem ignorant of this fact.

You're expressing a sentiment. Taken as a statement of fact it is audaciously wrong.

This is a useless statement and is basically irrelevant, as the topic is the extant network of Ring cameras and its consequences. You're just interjecting with a personal detail. Vapid behavior.

It's "in todo" (Spanish). Just wanted to help, good use of the phrase.