Fixed typo's - cell phone fat fingers

So correct me if I missed the meaning, they intend to increase the work hours from 40 to 48 per week with the expected outcome of increasing employment and productivity? I think I am missing something? Wouldn't employers have an opportunity to reduce staff or at the very least not hire more staff to over the hours of operation since 12 person can do six days and if your business is open only six days you wont need someone to cover that sixth day anymore. As for productivity? Don't know about you but the longer I work the more tired I get and less productive due to fatigue. Definitely missing something in the premise that goi9gn from 40 to 48 hour will increase employment and productivity? What am I missing?

A few years ago I began looking at cluster storage options and was introduced to Ceph as well as Glusterfs. Looking around I found a distribution call Petasan that used ceph. It was quick and easy to stand up a 5 node 60 osd cluster for testing in my lab with iscsi, nfs and smb.

It might be more effective and beneficial to find a college fund for the newborn. Funds can be used throughout their lives to improve their skills which in turn improves benefits to the economy and their overall earnings potential. That in turn contributes to revenue to the various levels of government. Establish an automatic college fund, states already have college fund structures and can also contribute. Better educated and skilled society and job prospects. From trade schools, 2 year degrees, 4 year etc. through our their lives that can use the funds to improve their skills and future. My 2 cents

Time to get the popcorn out and watch this comedy

As we all know a backup isn't a backup until you have successfully done a recovery. I don't know about you but I have had instances where the backup was supposedly completed in an enterprise environment and when an event required a recovery, well let's say it did not go well. Be interesting to see how redundancy/testing is done to ensure a good backup with such large tapes

Follow the money, someone is making a living off the gullibility of these individuals. As the article states: "The flat-Earth community has its own celebrities, music, merchandise -- and a weighty catalog of pseudo-scientific theories. It's been the subject of a Netflix documentary and has been endorsed by figures including the rapper B.o.B. Each year, more flat-Earth events fill the calendar, organizers say"

How often have we heard about the mass layoff and now the industry is surprised that people jump ship? The industry has shown a lack of loyalty to the employees the treated like replaceable widgets, it's no surprise that these employees are looking out for themselves. Add to that the various companies that replace their loyal employees with contractors (hmmm Disney etc) it shouldn't have surprised anyone that this would happen.

I think Spamhaus has taken this market and anyone else will have a hard time competing and still be profitable to make it worth while.

They can use ACDC - Big Balls for the add Campaign.

Most people who use Linux know that Anonymous collection of data isn't all that anonymous To quote Princess Bride "I don't think that means what you think that means"

yes it would be cool to be on Mars but with the risks and costs the moon base should be the first step. Prove the technology closer to home, isn't that why we built the Space Station (other than job security for defense contractors across the globe). The moon has resources we can use to launch a mission to Mars. With the lower gravity than Mars the Moon base can give humanity a better look at how long term exposure to low gravity will affect us while still being close to home. An international moon research facility would provide a much better return on investment and prepare for a longer journey. Get a Moon base up and running can be done with robotics, testing climate controls, hydroponics, water reclamation/recycling etc as well as rocket designs, radiation shielding ... We could even send the Current Space station as an orbital go between for the Moon instead of crash the station into the ocean at end of life. put a few rockets and slowly take it into Moon orbit. once we have a base built on the moon that has been tested via robotics and remote science equipment an expedition can go to the station in orbit around the moon (where supplies could be waiting) then take a trip down the the lunar surface. Add a space elevator between the moon and orbiting space station so you don't need to use fuel. Robotic cargo ships can ferry supplies and refuse between earth and the space station. It just seems to me we just started crawling in space with the Space station and now we want to run like Forest Gump by sending a manned mission to Mars at a far higher price than going back to the Moon

Like the old real estate adage location location location In this case it's content content content. Too often the adds are eating up more of show time and the shows they are putting on are crap reality shows. I for one have never had cable or satellite TV. I saw the crappy selections and the game they play in breaking up channels into various packages in order for you to get the 1 you wanted. The whole idea for cable I thought was no commercials at least that;s what I remember from way back when the cable companies started. Now it seems they are just as bad as broadcast TV. And how many reality crap shows and home shopping shows do we really need while great shows like Firefly are not given the chance to succeed. I did go with Netflix last year and haven't looked back. At least there are no commercials and I can watch the shows/movies on my schedule. Nothing like having your wife site through every episode for Stargate SG1, Stargate Atlantis and Stargate Universe back to back over a few months. Next stop the Star Trek marathon. I would have signed up for hulu to get some of the shows they haven't released for Netflix but they still have commercials and i am not paying for commercials, i can get that for free on the broadcast channel

Are you lost and posting to the wrong message? No place did I propose new taxes or forcing anyone to do anything. And by the way the article i am commenting on is about the government using the tax dollars we already give them to support new grids that benefit conglomerates. no mention of forcing any agenda or any agenda for that matter other than making people self sufficient. I guess your answer is to leave things as they are and never try a different approach. Let's just continue down the rat hole of the current model and hope someday the corporations will do the right thing. how did that work out with the banking industry so far. try reading an article before posting an message that makes no sense and lacks any merit other than some feeble attempt to look tough.

We keep going after the same model over and over again. Search Finster's Law: A closed mouth gathers no feet. Big conglomerates produce and consumers buy. They get to set the rates and raise prices when they can come up with an excuse (weather, maintenance, etc) and commodities traders can bet on the spot prices. It's an old and broken model that benefits corporations while sapping money from consumers. With all the billions they keep mentioning wouldn't it be nice if someone had a clue and said: "if we give people a big enough incentive to use renewable sources at their business, home, government offices, etc we would not need more expensive transmission lines" Instead of wasting OUR tax dollars on supporting a broken model let's support a self sufficient model. We give tax incentives to homeowners, landlords, apartment owners, builders, etc to incorporate solar, wind, geothermal, etc into the actual buildings. Schools and local governments can get grants to become producers of energy (solar, wind, geothermal, etc) and sell excess to the business next door or the house down the street. With schools being closed during peek hours of daylight, there is a lot of potential. Government buildings can be retrofitted to be energy neutral or even produce excess (considering they work 9-5 there is a lot of potential to produce excess energy after hours in the southern sunny states) for the local community. In high demand hours a local message to clean energy buildings can ask them to reduce their own usage to increase output to the grid. The smart grid that is needed is updating local utilities to buy excess from anyone who provides clean energy. not what some utilities do, offset your own usage but anything extra they get for free. Germany started a solar revolution by allowing anyone that wanted to install solar to get a set price for 20 years. after the 20 year period imagine what their energy costs will be, from the highest in the region to possibly the lowest. Farmers are installing solar arrays and getting additional income, banks are financing the installations, over a million jobs created from the solar industry. Other countries are starting to see the long term potential of getting off this energy roller coaster. http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2009/04/solar-incentives-could-ontario-be-the-next-germany It's OUR tax dollars they are using so let's put it to use in the right location, our local towns, schools, grocery stores, government buildings, libraries etc and not to support antiquated models fo they produce and we consume.