Oatmeal Cookie would be a decent, "non-trademark" name.
Oatmeal Cookie would be a decent, "non-trademark" name.
You say this because that's your experience. I'm at the track pretty often. Track days around here see a fair number of very high performance cars. Quite a few people who spring for GT3's and 911 turbos (as well as some more exotic brands) take them to the track and drive them like they were built to be driven. Don't assume everybody else's driving habits match your own.
There was always Congressional approval - though sometimes shortly after the beginning of the engagement. You are correct, however, that war was not declared.
My guess is that the company in question is not hiring H1-B workers, but outsourcing their IT department to another company that happens to employ H1-B workers. It's not illegal to outsource.
Think of a company that manufactures jeans and, in doing so, also manufactures rivets and buttons. They decide to have those rivets and buttons manufactured overseas to save money. As part of the outsourcing process, the company sends some US-based foreign workers to learn the button making process and then manage, from the US, the overseas manufacturing process. These employees are H1-B because they were brought, by the overseas manufacturer, to the US. They possess unique skills such as the ability to learn the manufacturing process AND the ability to communicate that process to the overseas plant in the native language of those plant workers. They also are able to manage the process from afar in the native language of the plant while communicating important details to the maker of jeans in English.
This same thing happens in IT - only the manufactured product is software.
I'm commenting on whether this is right or wrong, but just noting that I can see how companies get away with it. IT workers are now dealing with what factory workers dealt with decades ago.
I'm not arguing one way or the other, but I do think your specific point is missing something - you're forgetting that there are more veterans than acting military. This country is chock full of people who know exactly how to fight. The lazy part of your argument probably holds. I wouldn't call it lazy, but I will say that it's tough to risk the lives of you and your family when there is food on your table. I don't think there have been many rebellions by populaces that are warm and full.
To release things about Trump you have to have them. Unless you can show that they do and are choosing not to release them I don't think this is a valid argument. On top of that, our own media seems to be doing a pretty good job releasing things that show what a deplorable human being Trump is and I support that. I tend to feel that releasing facts that allow people to better understand what really happens is generally a good thing - even if you only happen to have facts on one side.
That said, I do agree that releasing subsets of the information (especially this late in the game) is concerning. For example, if only the "bad" facts or excerpts that take things out of context are being released, that is very concerning. For that reason, I wish they would release the whole set at once and be done with it; in a timely manner that allows for thorough review of all the information so that people can make an educated decision. The fact that they haven't done so and aren't saying that things are being withheld to allow for appropriate redaction (to protect innocent people or the security of people or nations) is highly problematic.
Unless you happen to be in Norway (the only European country with a higher per-hour productivity than the US) you're just spewing anecdotes. As a whole, Americans work longer AND are more productive than almost any European country - at least according to the UN. http://www.news.com.au/nationa...
I won't say that this is necessarily a good thing. I will say that your arrogance appears misplaced.
If there ever is a disaster or break-down of the type that requires people to resort to bunker living you can bet mobs of people will be quick to take their frustrations out on the nearest wealthy estate. These bunkers might stand for a long time without a concerted effort to destroy them, but they will be useless to protect their occupants for any length of time if they are attacked. That is unless those occupants also have a made the bunkers defensible and are harboring a force that can man those defenses. That, or they have hidden these bunkers so well as to ensure they would not be discovered.
When it comes to bunkers withstanding attack - they are designed to withstand an initial strike and hold off invaders until help can arrive or the occupants can escape. They don't hold out indefinitely. In situations like those described in the summary, there is no help on the way.
All that said, it seems that "how would I survive the apocalypse" is a fun mental exercise with which people with too much time and/or too much money (and maybe too much guilt) easily go overboard.
Actually, I'd say the ability to do things like this with relative anonymity was a new (and now past) situation. For most of human history around most of the world the population density was such that if you did something "notable" everyone in your town knew about it and it stuck with you forever. Sure, you could move and leave your reputation behind, but you were left to deal with being a stranger in a time when strangers were not treated favorably.
That said, I agree that it's a shame that some decisions have such an adverse impact on people's lives - especially when those decisions probably are due to a momentary lapse in judgement and really cause no or minimal harm to others. Sadly, the world has been shitty in this way for a very long time.
I think you need to go back and re-read these comments. I noted actual, documented movements with proven change reflected in the laws of this country. Such laws as the Civil Rights Act, Title 9 and on and on. These things had and continue to have tremendous impact on our society. So no, I'm not referring to "one hippy who existed in that generation." I'll note it's a generation of which I'm not part. I was born in 78.
Now let us examine your examples. Oh, that's right, you reported to a Boomer once. That makes you an expert on that generation for sure. Your other examples? Gallup polls show we are moving in the right direction - what does that even mean?
As to the impact of the Boomer generation dying out - we agree on that. Heck, I'll even agree that the Boomer generation today is stepping in a backward direction. Still, the boomers accomplished more in the 60's than all of the generations that have followed have accomplished period (from a civil movement standpoint). Let's note that whining on Facebook or posting scathing memes on Instagram doesn't seem to be an effective civil movement. In fact, I can't think of a single thing that any of those generations have accomplished. Even the small moves toward equality that have happened over the last couple of decades have been effected by Boomers. I say this as a person who is part of one of these rather unaccomplished generations.
Are you joking? The Boomers were a generation of blind trust in authority? Try reading some history once in a while. A quick look at the 60's might be a good place for you to start. Mass organization to protest the war, fight for civil rights, fight for women's rights, etc. All this done in a time when mass organization had to be organized in a highly manual fashion. In their youth, that generation put in an amazing fight to change the conditions of their country - probably far more so than any generation since.
I'll grant that, as they have become the generation with power and money, they settled down and become more comfortable with "the way things are," but I'd also say that is true of any group that happens to have the power and money.
Your anecdote about having a Boomer for a manager just doesn't jive with recorded history.
I can understand the sharp edge comment, but not the heat/noise. My MacBook Pro runs cool as a cucumber and damned near silent. It's like church mouse compared to the leaf blower that is my HP work machine. I'm not doubting you. I just wonder if there is a difference between years/models.
It's much easier to remove your phone case, pull open the media card slot, eject the card via software (assuming that is even still necessary in Android), remove the micro sd card, put the card in a card adapter, insert the card in the reader, and read the media. Then follow all the same steps in reverse. Yeah, that's way better than plugging in a cable or using wifi.
I assume SD cards are the "thing" for real photographers using real equipment, but I also see that they aren't nearly so great when applied in the phone world.
I think it's a valid point. Most of my photos, music, contacts, and other files are available in the cloud. I keep a minimum of stuff on my phone (which is an Android OS phone BTW) because there's no need for more. I keep some stuff around for those times when I'm offline, but those times are few and far between and I certainly don't require immediate access to 100+GB of data during those times.
All things being equal, more storage is better. Still, all things are never equal. I'd rather see the manufacturer spend money on a number of other things instead of additional storage (battery, screen quality, camera, amplifier, etc.).
I generally agree with this statement, but will say that it isn't always the case. A few years ago I traveled to Vancouver, B.C. with a few friends. I removed by stuff from the car and put it in the hotel room; pointing out that a car with US plates was a likely target for theft. My friends did not. When we returned to the car a few hours later it had been broken into. A number of items were stolen. One of my friends was particularly upset about losing a duffel that a family member had carried into WWII. He called the police and filled out a report. A few weeks later, his duffel was mailed to him (sans the valuable bits). Someone (I believe he said an officer, but it may have been a regular citizen) spotted it in an alley by a dumpster and brought it in.
They didn't mount an investigation or anything, but reporting the item stolen was the only thing that led to successful return of the item. As such, there is more value to it than just insurance purposes.
Ever notice that even the busiest people are never too busy to tell you just how busy they are?