Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:So scared (Score 1) 742

Cars and cellphones are fun to imagine here, but the reality is that China's manufacturing might has little to do with those industries. Every big box store in your city is filled with all kinds of random crap from napkin holders, BBQ grills, decorative Santa statues, and so on.

A toy manufacturer wanted to return their processes back to the US to avoid all of the liability of undetected chemical substitution. They found out there was no manufacturing capability in US for the fancy cardboard boxes which show off the toys but make them transportable. They sourced those from outside of the US and kept on their path. So one can argue that's a temporary problem... but it points to how serious of a factor time and speed of adaptability is here. It can't be done overnight.

Trade wars have real impacts before the market can catch up. A stupid but real example is like the UK where their Toberlone bars have been redesigned to decrease the chocolate content. A scary example is how the international oil trade shut down our domestic shale oil production and bankrupted dozens of companies very quickly.

This is the big leagues! Poor choices at the scale of the US economy have enormous impacts.

Comment Re:Don't think it'll happen (Score 2) 1368

If all he does is chip away at the progress made in the last ten or twenty years, he'll be fine. If he starts taking a pickaxe to things that have been part of America for the last sixty or seventy, all bets are off.

This is really the key, and it depends on if you think he'll do what he's said, or continue to do what he's always done. One way and we elected a White Nationalist Party that wants to kick off of the minorities off White-provided subsidies and shut down the border and all international aid while bombing the hell out of the Middle East, the other way we get the brand Trump and he's really mostly like the rest of the current power structure just extremely anti-Regulation and tax and the social issues are really not actually factor.

Comment Re:Disheartening (Score 1) 164

I wish the new owners of /. well, and I hope they somehow manage to revive it, but I honestly think it's too late, discussion has moved to Reddit or more specialised websites with more active moderation systems. Reddit might be full of trash (including whole subreddits), but the volume is so high, that it's submerged underneath the vast mass and only visible if you choose to go and look for it most of the time.

It seems to me like the big change is that people don't participate in conversation online like they used to, rather than the conversations and experts moving onto somewhere else. Or at least, if they went somewhere I don't know where it is. It's like using the restroom at a bar and coming back to find the crowd left.

For this specific post, I didn't find any particularly inspiring discussions elsewhere about it. But... this kind of news takes time to process and come up with reasonable comments, and Slashdot was always dominated by people that wanted to comment without reading the article so perhaps this one isn't the best yardstick.

But still... I think the phenomenon may be much bigger than Slashdot/moderation systems/owners... etc.

Comment Re:Strict liability? (Score 1, Interesting) 392

Here's what I think your argument is: It was negligent for Tesla to provide a feature that a reasonable person would foresee substantial misuse leading to death.

This kind of product liability in cars has had lots of cases to work through the elements in the past... see Jablonski v. Ford Motor Company as a recent case.

When the use and misuse of a product results in death, the burden of diligence is on both the manufacturer and the operator. If you try to make all products perfectly safe that's an impossible condition. If you let manufacturers off the hook completely that's a wild ride too.

If you're the product engineer that is looking at the data that says when Autopilot is used correctly it's expected to save lives, and only adds to the accident rate if the feature is misused. That phenomenon pretty much describes every safety feature ever added to cars. ABS... great until you try to do the old fashioned pump the brakes. Air bags... awesome unless you put a child seat in the front seat.

So as that product engineer, if you don't roll it out, you'll save a few people who would misuse it, and kill others that would be saved by using it correctly. Beyond case law, basic ethics kick in.

Autonomous cars are going to produce some crazy case law!!

Comment Re:Wow, a page from the Valery Fabrikant (Score 2) 396

There are a few religions with their own country that have seats in the UN, but Islam isn't one of them.

And there are some people that will lie, cheat, steal, and hurt you, but hey don't exclusively belong to any group. They are mixed in among everyone and the most dangerous ones are the ones that wear the same clothes as you.

Comment Re:Shouldn't be legal (Score 1) 127

I have to agree. Statistical guesswork might be the underlying mechanism behind perception, so as uncomfortable as that can be maybe that's all our brains are doing. I think when it comes to judgement, it gets very distasteful quickly to use the same methods. So far we're still at chatbot levels of rational decision making, so while it's amazing and a huge accomplishment to get a computer to describe a photograph mostly correctly much of the time, it's hard to see how any of the predictions being made in the space can be achievable... at least without assuming another major breakthrough.

Comment Re:Capitalism does capitalism things (Score 1) 921

Those C-level folk are disconnected from the reality of everyday people. It's all about profit margins, quarterly statements, shareholder meetings, bonuses and so on. It's not about how their business will crash and burn supposedly affecting their poor employees, it's about earning a single cent than they did before and fuck everyone else.

I think you just described humans in general. Whether it's about other people's jobs, health, the environment, on and on. Giving a crap is about individuals breaking out of the mass and driving the difference. And it's tough. Some of the best organizations out there with the explicit mission of increasing employment for economically disadvantaged people have a negative view by the general public. The same thing applies to organizations trying to boost the health of other people, or the environment.

For a company to be able to fix societal issues like this, they have to be a monopoly, or the law has to change to create the same conditions for all players. And even then you'll end up with a grey market of people willing to arbitrage out the last pennies.

Comment History will always remember the 747 (Score 1) 345

The version of the story I was told was that at the time it was on the drawing table, supersonic transport was the future for passenger travel for everyone. But cargo was not expected to go that way and Boeing felt they needed to split their offering into an efficient giant cargo aircraft and a supersonic transport for people. They designed the cargo transport to have an elevated cockpit so it could have maximum internal space (which became the 747's top deck), and the supersonic transport was ultimately canned. The 747 ended up just as popular for passenger transport as a happy coincidence.

It's not about Europe's elite vs American pluralism. Go over to Europe and see just how elite their airlines are... the US is the one with classes. Going out on a limb, the 747's ability to isolate the classes and provide a swanky bar for those of distinction probably had something to do with it's success. The US pulled the plug on supersonic transport before it ever had a chance to prove itself or not (look up the supersonic airport that is half built in the Everglades, it's still there!).

Comment Re:As a Greek, disappointed from slashdot (Score 1) 1307

The dynamic is pretty simple if you can look at it from the rear view mirror.

Forget all of the countries and the names. To get people out of trouble from borrowing too much, the people that didn't borrow too much have two choices... cut off the remainder and let them sort it out which will be very ugly, or to loan them even more money and cross their fingers that everything will work out.

There's no way that any newspaper story can capture what really happened in Greece, but yet that doesn't matter. It still comes down to whether Greece gets cut off or not. That's why the no vote is so puzzling.. it can either be a bold move to draw the conclusion of a mess that went too far, or a case where the demonstrators burn down their own neighborhood to make a point. I'm not sure which has happened, but if I was Europe, I would would shift from rescuing the economy to rescuing the people and sending food and medicine.

Comment Re:Failure to even Attempt to process the article. (Score 5, Informative) 926

I've manipulated my weight by over 30 pounds down and up since the beginning of the year. I've done it on a schedule based on calorie intake and burn measured carefully. I average 3.5 workout hours a week. I've spent just as much time eating over my calories burned as I have eating under. And I'm not eating superfoods or no carbs, or no fat, or whatever other fad... I'm eating pretty much the same stuff I always have just on a budget. My weight change has been impossible to detect day-to-day on the scale it's been so slow yet the total impact has been huge.

For years I believed the calorie thing was bunk and indeed I managed my "weight" but got fatter and fatter with the scale largely in the same range. When my weight would go up I'd cut back and lose weight... but it didn't impact my physical dimensions. So last year I said that was it and decided to get serious.

Losing weight is a mental task. It's the time and consistency that it takes that is so brutal. Society suffers from a negative feedback loop where everything promises quick results, and when you don't get them, it feels impossible. The reality is losing a pound a week of fat is rapid weight loss. And when your weight fluctuates by a few pounds a day it can take a long time for readily apparent results to show up. But if you stack up 26 weeks of weight loss you will feel like a champion and it didn't take superhuman effort on any given day to do it.

Start today and by the end of the year you'll see major changes. Or you can keep doing what you are doing thinking the calorie math doesn't work and you will probably keep on the same trend line.

Comment Re:"As soon as 20 years?" (Score 1) 475

For what it's worth, the Saturn 5 as it was configured in 1969 had enough Delta-v to get to Mars and enter Mars orbit. It just didn't have consumables to keep the people alive that long. It probably would have taken three Saturn 5 launches to mount a Mars mission with that hardware. We had most of the technology to do this in 1969 although some of the details of how to accomplish it remain unsolved.

Comment Proof of the Law of Large Numbers (Score 1) 217

As the number of people foreclosed on increases, the probability of find just about anything increases as well. If there's an Action Comics #1 out there, that makes me suspect (1) we've foreclosed on a hell of alot of people, and (2) I can only imagine what other improbable forgotten items are being found. We could very easily be approaching Hoffa odds.


Own Your Own Fighter Jet 222

gimmebeer writes "The Russian Sukhoi SU-27 has a top speed of Mach 1.8 (more than 1,300 mph) and has a thrust to weight ratio greater than 1 to 1. That means it can accelerate while climbing straight up. It was designed to fight against the best the US had to offer, and now it can be yours for the price of a mediocre used business jet."

PhD Candidate Talks About the Physics of Space Battles 361

darthvader100 writes "Gizmodo has run an article with some predictions on what future space battles will be like. The author brings up several theories on propulsion (and orbits), weapons (explosives, kinetic and laser), and design. Sounds like the ideal shape for spaceships will be spherical, like the one in the Hitchhiker's Guide movie."

Slashdot Top Deals

As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error. -- Weisert