Those laws have everything to do with intent, and aren't applicable to this situation. Unless your trying to state me walking down the street filming a friend do a stunt and I happen to catch a nipple cause someone forgot to close their blinds, as illegal.

Windows 7 actually makes use of the RAM you paid for, NEWS AT 11!

One of my favorite parts of this Superbowl (heck, any game he plays in) is watching Peyton Manning dissect and outsmart the entire defense with audibles and calling out the mike backer... all of which happens before the ball is even snapped. Any true football fan would agree.

Nope. Nice try though.

Click on the link that the average of 77k is based off of. It is coming from one job, that is that of a "SUPERINTENDENT Nassau County Coop Building." It just happened to have the words "garbage" and "one 'man' job" in the description.

http://www.indeed.com/rc/clk?jk=2865f82583fa2637

That would be an interesting error message.

Not true. I have done it many times before.

AHHH, so thats why my girlfriend kept saying DNF after... ahem.

Nevermind.

The article states that the plug-in fails to read files created with 2 of the 6. Of the two it "fails" on, one is in BETA, the other is a RC.

It MUST be Microsoft's fault that their proven product that's been on the market for years and is used everywhere, doesn't work when you try to feed it files created in unproven piece of shit applications. Yeah.

Very rarely do I get actual spam (unsolicited, no opt out, misleading header) in my inbox, less than once every two months or so, but what everyone seems to forget is that the ISP's have to pay for the bandwidth of all this spam, and that bandwidth cost gets passed straight on to us consumers.

So even if we don't get it in our inboxes, we are still paying a price since spam is the equivalent to sending a piece of snail-mail that is paid by the receiver.

"Spencer then carefully selected 391 faculty members out of MSU's approximately 4,500 faculty and e-mailed them her version of the committee's letter." 391/

"Kara Spencer notified the group that she would be sending her own version of the group's response as "an informational email" to faculty members she believed would be concerned about this issue. None of the administrators involved in the discussion complained about this plan."

This is not spam. She was given the position (job) in student government and emailed teachers (co-workers) about an impeding change. How is this considered spam? Them (as teachers) are soliciting to updates about policies by taking the job.