Oh, absolutely. My problem is just how these criticisms are being framed -- it sounds like they have some behind-the-scenes insights into Villeneuve's feelings about the film gleaned from an interview, or something.

Greatly dislike how this article frames opinion as fact. It keeps saying "Villeneuve does this", or "Villeneuve wanted that", but gives no source for the claims. To me, it's clear this article is just a shitty, deceptive, self-righteous way of stating one's personal observations.

Observations I happen to generally disagree with. I loved the hell out of this flick; it touched me on an almost personal level, like no film as done in a long time.

I'm not going to suggesting this article is just the inevitable mainstream contrarianism when something is widely beloved, but I'm having a hard time not pulling the trigger on saying it...

Suck on that, SpaceX, you fucking hacks!

Hey, folks. There's a couple places I could probably post this, but figured this was as good a place as any. ;) With fake news being a big problem, I wrote a quick open-source browser extension to highlight articles from comedy or low-quality news sources. Tried not to be biased, but I'm sure there's some present.

Anyway, you can check it out on the Chrome web store: https://chrome.google.com/webs...

Or hit up the GitHub repo: https://github.com/Fortyseven/...

Whilst I'm sure examples of this exist, it goes the other way too. I used to live somewhere that F1 teams started testing on a disused air strip. It was used occasionally for some motor sport previously but was inaudible outside of its immediate environs. When F1 teams moved in, areas that had been peaceful for decades (since the site strip was last used in WW2) were suddenly subject to a lot of noise - villages and urban areas miles and miles away from the site. It's not just the immediate surroundings of a race track for just the duration of the events that suffer at the hands of noise pollution caused by motor racing. This is an article I quickly googled, but it was going on for years- http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/new...

A wise old man taught me 'put less in'

TFA says '..youâ(TM)ll quickly see that it doesnâ(TM)t feel the same as Gmailâ"and thatâ(TM)s the point. Gmailâ(TM)s still there for you, but Inbox is something new....' So it doesn't sound like it will be compulsory at all. Just an optional 'view' or secondary app maybe. It sounds quite appealing to me and it would fit in well to my email workflow but I'll wait to try it..

You can give someone food, or you can teach them to grow it. Probably the idea at play here. Sure, you can do whatever you want to them, but they'll never /understand/ if they're simply forced.

Hopefully THIS arm is not made of hot dogs.