succeed on dektop means to fail on good os? (Score 1)

If Linux will succeed on desktop, that means IMHO that the os will dramatically change in something "microsoftier". I mean, we will end up in something, without terminals, with automatic software installation and a "My Computer" icon. Because for the standard windowsuser this is the essence of an os. Then parts of Linux will become propretiary, unstable, overloaded and slow, like KDE.

I dont want Linux to "succeed on the desktop" - but i am a blackbox-purist, so my two cents probably arent important?