Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment I'm not concerned and I have zero sympathy (Score 0) 2

"It turns out that the image he posted, though admittedly disturbing, was not technically porn." "was to make a point about how you can post images of minors being sexualized without breaking any laws" It may not have broke any laws however I'll harbour a bet that it broke the terms and conditions of the service he posted it to. In my experience when someone qualifies something as "not technically" it normally is that close that it probably is somewhere else.

Comment Re:Raped thrice, ain't we? (Score 0) 173

To be quite fair, very few of the ISP's, if any, are in favour of the bill and have fought hard to have it repealed or rewritten in some form. The people to blame here are the MP's and only the MP's as they wrote the bill, discussed it, ignored their constituents and voted for it. The Lib Dems even said during the last general election that they would actively seek to repeal the legislation that they now support. In short, don't believe MP's.

Slashdot Top Deals

Beware the new TTY code!

Working...