While I applaud this new effort...they REALLY need to consider a name change.
Ladybird?
They may be turning off close to half their potential audience....men.
Sounds too feminine, girly.....
It's the name of an insect. A type of beetle. And, just like other beetles, there are male and female ones!
The title is very misleading.
The maintainers were not "kicked off GitHub" - GitHub had no part in this, and the maintainers still have access to GitHub.
The maintainers were removed from a private organisation and its repos by the organisation owner.
No, that's not true - at least, according to those involved (I have no way of verifying): the GitHub repos did not belong to the organisation - the organisation decided that it wanted to own them, so it persuaded someone who had sufficient access to give them the access and remove it from the people who did legitimately own them.
It seems you donâ(TM)t have a clue. If you have a USB-C port you can plug in anything from 40 or 80 gigabit USB-4 (display port), 20 Gbit USB 3.2, 10 Gbit USB 3.1, or 480Mbit USB-2, and it will all work. Thatâ(TM)s what you want. The USB-C ports are identical. You cannot confuse them. You get the speed of the plugged-in device.
If only that were true! Unfortunately there's nothing to stop a manufacturer putting a USB-C port on a laptop, and having it only support (say) USB-3.1 downwards. And so some of them do this - because it's cheaper. Maybe there's one USB C port that also supports TB/DisplayPort, with a tiny little logo next to it to let you know which one it is. If you're lucky...
How the hell do they grant right-of-way to entrants and still have a working roundabout? Doesn't that defeat the point?
Yeah it doesn't work well! But last time I checked (admittedly some years ago now) most of those roundabouts were being replaced with standard traffic-on-roundabout-has-priority ones.
If an abstract thing like what size any particular area looks like on a projection harms identity and pride, then pray tell what projection should be adopted that will show all areas at their true size, and won't harm children's identity?
There are a whole bunch of projections that preserve area. One is mentioned in the summary, but it's not the only one. These projections accurately depict areas by distorting angles (where Mercator does the reverse, accurately showing angles by distorting areas). It's a question of what map is more suitable for a particular purpose - I guess it's unlikely kids in school are going to use their map to circumnavigate the world?
Are you smart enough to notice the title of that book? It's no accident, as Zinn would brag. It's like "The People's Car" (the Volkswagen), "The People's army", "The People's Committe" or any other Marxist thing which is named as though it belongs to all the people in a Marxist utopian society.
So apparently the American Constitution ("We the people...") is actually Marxist? TIL!
Sigh. Since eons, there is CamelCase and mountainCase. What on earth is snake case?
it_has_thin_bits_and_bulges
So what fresh new hell have they cooked up for my domain certs now?
... that they will no longer issue certificates for your domain to someone else? Sounds like a good thing, on the whole!
We are to believe it will automagically unfuck bad code. It is not to be taken seriously.
This is the correct answer. Having read most of the white paper, I'm left wondering whether this is an April Fool's joke released too soon. Some of my favourites:
TrapC is compatible with most C code
followed shortly afterwards by
TrapC compatibility when compiling C code is limited in a small way by the removal of ‘goto’ and ‘union’.
So that'll rule out probably 98% of real life C programs then!
also
how TrapC translation is implemented is a compiler implementation detail. Translations might be from a local dictionary, be captured ad hoc from user-provided input or be AI-generated across the Internet.
The paper claims that the standard unmodified C "Hello, world" program, if compiled with TrapC and run with LANG=fr_FR, will output "Bonjour le monde". With translation automatically provided by AI. I can see literally no way how that could end badly!
You only need two satellites and the surface of the earth.
No, that's not true. I'll try to explain why.
Each satellite transmits (very roughly) "My precise position is (here), and the time by my clock is (timestamp)". (In fact the satellites send a bit more - including each other's positions - but that needn't concern us here.)
With one satellite, this tells you nothing about your position: you know the timestamp the satellite thought it was when it sent its transmission, but you have no idea how long that transmission took to arrive. (Unless you already happen to have a pre-synchronised atomic clock, which most GPS receivers do not!)
With two satellites, you can compare the timestamps you receive - the difference in the times tells you that one of the satellites is closer to you than the other, and by how much. That's enough to narrow down your position to anywhere on a specific curved surface (a hyperboloid, as it happens),
Another, third, satellite then narrows the position down further - this time to anywhere on a specific curve. If you know you're on the surface of the Earth, that's usually enough to give your position - job done; if not, a fourth satellite will do the job.
But that's not the end of the story: while you know the positions of the satellites to rather high precision, the measurements of when you received the timestamps are approximate - for a variety of reasons, but including the fact that atmospheric conditions may change the propagation speed of the signal (and you have no way of knowing whether this has happened), and the fact that (since your receiver doesn't have an atomic clock) its local clock will drift slightly over time.
If all of the satellites you're tracking are close together, then the differences between the timestamps you measure from the different satellites will be small. But the absolute error in your measurement (due to local clock drift, atmospheric conditions etc) remains roughly the same - so the percentage imprecision in the differences becomes much larger - and so the uncertainty in your position increases accordingly. This is what is referred to as "bad geometry".
They allow a yubikey
What do you do if your Yubikey dies or is lost?
It's an important question. Sensible sites (and I think Google is included in this) allow you to register multiple Yubikeys (so you can keep one with you, and one in a secure place - or even more, depending on your level of paranoia). Other sites (Paypal, I'm looking at you - also Salesforce while we're at it) do not, and this is a big flaw.
At work, the authority of a person is inversely proportional to the number of pens that person is carrying.